Cited by 50Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Differences between bilateral adrenal incidentalomas and unilateral lesions

Open access
Pasternak, Jesse D., Seib, Carolyn D., Seiser, Natalie, Tyrell, J. Blake, Liu, Chienying, Cisco, Robin M., Gosnell, Jessica E., Shen, Wen T. +2 more·2015·JAMA Surgery

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Adrenal incidentalomas are found in 1% to 5% of abdominal cross-sectional imaging studies. Although the workup and management of unilateral lesions are well established, limited information exists for bilateral incidentalomas. OBJECTIVE: To compare the natural history of patients having bilateral incidentalomas with those having unilateral incidentalomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of consecutive patients referred to an academic multidisciplinary adrenal conference. The setting was a tertiary care university hospital among a cohort of 500 patients with adrenal lesions between July 1, 2009, and July 1, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence, age, imaging characteristics, biochemical workup, any intervention, and final diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with bilateral incidentalomas and 112 patients with unilateral incidentalomas were identified. The mean age at diagnosis of bilateral lesions was 58.7 years. The mean lesion size was 2.4 cm on the right side and 2.8 cm on the left side. Bilateral incidentalomas were associated with a significantly higher prevalence of subclinical Cushing syndrome (21.7% [5 of 23] vs 6.2% [7 of 112]) (P = .009) and a significantly lower prevalence of pheochromocytoma (4.3% [1 of 23] vs 19.6% [22 of 112]) (P = .003) compared with unilateral lesions, while rates of hyperaldosteronism were similar in both groups (4.3% [1 of 23] vs 5.4% [6 of 112]) (P > .99). Only one patient with bilateral incidentalomas underwent unilateral resection. The mean follow-up was 4 years (range, 1.2-13.0 years). There were no occult adrenocortical carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Bilateral incidentalomas are more likely to be associated with subclinical Cushing syndrome and less likely to be pheochromocytomas. Although patients with bilateral incidentalomas undergo a workup similar to that in patients with unilateral lesions, differences in their natural history warrant a greater index of suspicion for subclinical Cushing syndrome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1683

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a surgical series of 112 unilateral AI and 23 bilateral AI, mild cortisol excess was present in 21.7% bilateral vs 6.2% unilateral.

    “a more recent surgical series including 112 unilateral AI and 23 bilateral AI, where mild cortisol excess was present in 21.7% bilateral AI versus 6.2% of unilateral AI (321).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [321]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 50

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Vassilatou E, Vryonidou A, Ioannidis D, Paschou SA, Panagou M, Tzavara I. Bilateral adrenal incidentalomas differ from unilateral adrenal incidentalomas in subclinical cortisol hypersecretion but not in potential clinical implications. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(1):37-45.
  2. Iacobone M, Citton M, Scarpa M, Viel G, Boscaro M, Nitti D. Systematic review of surgical treatment of subclinical Cushing's syndrome. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(4):318-330.

Authors
Pasternak, J. D., Seib, C. D., Seiser, N., Tyrell, J. B., Liu, C., Cisco, R. M., Gosnell, J. E., Shen, W. T., Suh, I., & Duh, Q.-Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • Good Samaritan Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Duh, Quan-Yang
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
150
Issue
10
Pages
974
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1573372138
Cited by
50
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
subclinical Cushing's syndrome, pheochromocytoma, hyperaldosteronism, adrenocortical carcinoma, adrenalectomy
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Cushing Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pheochromocytoma, Retrospective Studies, Incidental Findings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review