The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Integrated Care Coordination With Postsurgical Outcomes in High-Risk Older Adults: The Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) Initiative
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Older adults undergoing elective surgery experience higher rates of preventable postoperative complications than younger patients. Objective: To assess clinical outcomes for older adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery via a collaborative intervention by surgery, geriatrics, and anesthesia focused on perioperative health optimization. Design, Setting, and Participants: Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) is a quality improvement initiative with prospective data collection. Participants in an existing geriatrics-based clinic within a single-site academic health center were included if they were at high risk for complications (ie, older than 85 years or older than 65 years with cognitive impairment, recent weight loss, multimorbidity, or polypharmacy) undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Outcomes were compared with a control group of patients older than 65 years who underwent similar surgeries by the same group of general surgeons immediately before implementation of POSH. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included length of stay, 7- and 30-day readmissions, and level of care at discharge. Secondary outcomes were delirium and other major postoperative complications. Outcomes data were derived from institutional databases linked with electronic health records and billing data sets. Results: One hundred eighty-three POSH patients were compared with 143 patients in the control group. On average, patients in the POSH group were older compared with those in the control group (75.6 vs 71.9 years; P < .001; 95% CI, 2.27 to 5.19) and had more chronic conditions (10.6 vs 8.5; P = .001; 95% CI, 0.86 to 3.35). Median length of stay was shorter among POSH patients (4 days vs 6 days; P < .001; 95% CI, -1.06 to -4.21). Patients in the POSH group had lower readmission rates at 7 days (5 of 180 [2.8%] vs 14 of 142 [9.9%]; P = .007; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.74) and 30 days (14 of 180 [7.8%] vs 26 of 142 [18.3%]; P = .004; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.75) and were more likely to be discharged home with self-care (114 of 183 [62.3%] vs 73 of 143 [51.1%]; P = .04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.47). Patients in the POSH group experienced fewer mean number of complications (0.9 vs 1.4; P < .001; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.89) despite higher rates of documented delirium (52 of 183 [28.4%] vs 8 of 143 [5.6%]; P < .001; 95% CI, 3.06 to 14.65). A greater proportion of POSH patients underwent laparoscopic procedures (92 of 183 [50%] vs 55 of 143 [38.5%]; P = .001; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.52). Tests for interactions between POSH patients and procedure type were insignificant for all outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite higher mean age and morbidity burden, older adults who participated in an interdisciplinary perioperative care intervention had fewer complications, shorter hospitalizations, more frequent discharge to home, and fewer readmissions than a comparison group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Preoperative evaluation clinics focusing on evaluating high-risk patients have shown improvement in 30-day postoperative outcomes (18).”
From Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method: A New Method for Detection of Delirium
Inouye, S. K., van Dyck, C. H., Alessi, C. A., Balkin, S., Siegal, A. P., & Horwitz, R. I. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941 · Cited by 5,250
Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients
Makary, M. A., Segev, D. L., Pronovost, P. J., Syin, D., Bandeen-Roche, K., Patel, P., Takenaga, R., Devgan, L., Holzmueller, C. G., Tian, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028 · Cited by 2,184
Kaiser, M., Bauer, J. M., Rämsch, C., Uter, W. J. C., Guigoz, Y., Cederholm, T., Thomas, D. R., Anthony, P. S., Charlton, K. E., Maggio, M. G., et al. (2009) · The journal of nutrition health & aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7 · Cited by 2,083
Khuri, S. F., Henderson, W. G., DePalma, R. G., Mosca, C. L., Healey, N. A., & Kumbhani, D. J. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000179621.33268.83 · Cited by 1,451
Surgical Risk Factors, Morbidity, and Mortality in Elderly Patients
Turrentine, F. E., Wang, H., Simpson, V. B., & Jones, R. S. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.026 · Cited by 1,062
Chow, W. B., Rosenthal, R. A., Merkow, R. P., Ko, C. Y., & Esnaola, N. F. (2012) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.017 · Cited by 918
Khuri, S. F. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00073-2 · Cited by 773
Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients
Turrentine, F. E., Wang, H., Simpson, V. B., & Jones, R. S. (2008) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/s1040-8428(08)70016-7 · Cited by 711
Mohanty, S., Rosenthal, R. A., Russell, M. M., Neuman, M. D., Ko, C. Y., & Esnaola, N. F. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.026 · Cited by 638
Hamel, M. B., Henderson, W. G., Khuri, S. F., & Daley, J. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53159.x · Cited by 631
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–209 of 209
Harada, K., Shichijo, Y., Wang, Y., Hung, W., Baim‐Lance, A. M., Ko, F., & Chow, S. (2026) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.70656
Clinician Considerations Regarding Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia
Adler, R., Chunga, R. E., Centracchio, J. A., Ahmad, Z. N., Sepucha, K., Sheu, C., Shah, S. K., Clark, C. J., Kim, D., Mitchell, S. L., et al. (2026) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2026.3729
Devinney, M. J., Takla, J., VanDusen, K. W., Wright, M. C., Spector, A. R., Thomas, J., Avasarala, P., Hall, A., Syed, A., Adams, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.70685
Self-citationAre we really providing the best care possible to older stroke survivors?
Heffernan, J. (2026) · Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings · doi:10.1080/08998280.2026.2720845
Skeletal muscle mass and surgical outcome in neuro-oncology
Lai, Y.-M., Claassen, M. T., Kaya, E., Keil, V. C., Verburg, N., Schober, P. R., & van den Brom, C. E. (2026) · Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.inat.2026.102377
Alabi, R. O., Almangush, A., Elmusrati, M. S., Ehrsson, Y. T., Laurell, G. F. E., & Mäkitie, A. A. (2026) · Medical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12032-026-03420-5
Lundgren, E., Aasbrenn, M., Lindner, S., Macijauskienė, J., Roller‐Wirnsberger, R., & Denkinger, M. D. (2026) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105791
Jehan, F. S., Longbottom, B., Kim, S. Y., & Aziz, H. (2026) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2026.110764
Frailty assessment tools for preoperative evaluation of older adults: scoping review
Chesney, T. R., Wong, C. L., Tricco, A. C., Wijeysundera, D. N., Louridas, M., Jayaraj, K., Sethuram, C., Mac, A., Khan, S., Anthes, V. B., et al. (2026) · BJS Open · doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrag129
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, S. R., Heflin, M. T., Whitson, H. E., Dalton, T. O., Lidsky, M. E., Liu, P., Poer, C. M., Sloane, R., Thacker, J. K., White, H. K., Yanamadala, M., & Lagoo-Deenadayalan, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Corresponding author
- McDonald, Shelley R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2018-05-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 454
- ISSN
- 2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5875304
- OpenAlex
- W2782332747
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John A. Hartford Foundation
- Hartford Foundation for Public Giving
- School of Medicine, Duke University
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Keywords
- integrated care coordination, older adults, elective abdominal surgery, perioperative optimization, geriatric surgery, postoperative complications, delirium, length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, discharge disposition, cognitive impairment, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, quality improvement
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Morbidity, Patient Readmission, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, United States, Elective Surgical Procedures, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Perioperative Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review