Cited by 37Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Public Attitudes Toward Weight Loss Surgery in the United States

Open access

Abstract

This national cross-sectional survey of the US general population assesses the association of negative attitudes toward weight loss surgery and its subsequent use in obese patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4650

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The widespread but unproven assumption that body weight is entirely controllable by lifestyle choices and that self-directed efforts can reverse even severe obesity or type 2 diabetes could explain low public support for coverage of anti-obesity interventions beyond diet and exercise.

    “The widespread, but unproven, assumption that body weight is entirely controllable by lifestyle choices and that self-directed efforts can reverse even severe forms of obesity or type 2 diabetes44 could explain the low level of public support for coverage of anti-obesity interventions beyond diet and exercise45, regardless of their evidence base.”

    From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A US research survey showed that only 19.2% of responders supported insurance coverage of metabolic operations.

    “A research survey in the United States showed that only 19.2% of responders supported insurance coverage of metabolic operations45.”

    From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

    Results, Table 1 reports that 19.2% supported insurance coverage always, while another 72.8% supported it when the procedure provides health benefits. Only 8.0% opposed coverage, so the claim that only 19.2% supported coverage omits the much larger group supporting conditional coverage. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bhogal, 2015, Inequity to the utilization of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis., Obes Surg, 25, 888, 10.1007/s11695-015-1595-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dolan, P., Afaneh, C., Symer, M., Dakin, G. F., Pomp, A., & Yeo, H.
Affiliations
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Yeo, Heather
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2019-03-01
Volume
154
Issue
3
Pages
264
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903787221
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32HS000066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, public attitudes, obesity, public opinion, attitudes toward surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Public Opinion, United States, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review