Cited by 1,225Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations

Open access
Engelman, Daniel T., Ben Ali, Walid, Williams, Judson B., Perrault, Louis P., Reddy, V. Seenu, Arora, Rakesh C., Roselli, Eric E., Khoynezhad, Ali +9 more·2019·JAMA Surgery

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care can lead to improvements in clinical outcomes and cost savings. This article aims to present consensus recommendations for the optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A review of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, large nonrandomized studies, and reviews was conducted for each protocol element. The quality of the evidence was graded and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. Development of these recommendations was endorsed by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 204 · Cited by 1,225

Authors
Engelman, D. T., Ben Ali, W., Williams, J. B., Perrault, L. P., Reddy, V. S., Arora, R. C., Roselli, E. E., Khoynezhad, A., Gerdisch, M., Levy, J. H., Lobdell, K., Fletcher, N., Kirsch, M., Nelson, G., Engelman, R. M., Gregory, A. J., & Boyle, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Baystate Medical Center (US)
  • Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada
  • WakeMed (US)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • Centennial Medical Center (US)
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • MemorialCare Heart and Vascular Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • Franciscan Health Indianapolis (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Atrium Health, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, North Carolina
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • St. Charles Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Engelman, Daniel T.
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
154
Issue
8
Pages
755
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943204414
Cited by
1,225
References
204
Citations by year
2026: 193 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 204 · 2023: 166 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 1
FWCI
22.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Keywords
enhanced recovery after surgery, perioperative care, cardiac surgery, consensus recommendations, evidence-based protocols, clinical outcomes, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Perioperative Care, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review