The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AAPOR Reporting Guidelines for Survey Studies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study adhered to the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) reporting guideline.
“adhering to the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) reporting guideline.15”
From Assessing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials With Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Marcopulos, 2020, Survey research in neuropsychology: a systematic review., Clin Neuropsychol, 34, 32, 10.1080/13854046.2019.1590643 · DOI · Paper page
- Brasel, 2020, Practical guide to survey research., JAMA Surg, 155, 351, 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4401 · DOI
- Pezold, 2016, Defining a research agenda for patient-reported outcomes in surgery: using a Delphi survey of stakeholders., JAMA Surg, 151, 930, 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1640 · DOI
- Langbecker, 2017, Using survey methods in telehealth research: a practical guide., J Telemed Telecare, 23, 770, 10.1177/1357633X17721814 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials With Large Language Models
Lai, H., Ge, L., Sun, M., Pan, B., Huang, J., Hou, L., Yang, Q., Liu, J., Liu, J., Ye, Z., et al. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12687 · Cited by 103
Language models for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in complementary medicine
Lai, H., Liu, J., Bai, C., Liu, H., Pan, B., Luo, X., Hou, L., Zhao, W., Xia, D., Tian, J., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01457-w · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitt, S. C., Schwartz, T. A., & Chu, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- JAMA Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2021-08-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 785
- ISSN
- 2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3152247201
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, survey methodology, research quality
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Guidelines as Topic, Checklist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
