Cited by 31Health, Medicine and SocietyEthics and bioethics in healthcareGlobal Health and Surgery

Citizenship and Social Responsibility in Surgery: A Review

Janeway, Megan, Wilson, Spencer, Sanchez, Sabrina E., Arora, Tania K., Dechert, Tracey·2022·JAMA Surgery

Abstract

Importance: Social determinants of health have been shown to be key drivers of disparities in access to surgical care and surgical outcomes. Though the concept of social responsibility has received growing attention in the medical field, little has been published contextualizing social responsibility in surgery. In this narrative review, we define social responsibility as it relates to surgery, explore the duty of surgeons to society, and provide examples of social factors associated with adverse surgical outcomes and how they can be mitigated. Observations: The concept of social responsibility in surgery has deep roots in medical codes of ethics and evolved alongside changing views on human rights and the role of social factors in disease. The ethical duty of surgeons to society is based on the ethical principles of benevolence and justice and is grounded within the framework of the social contract. Surgeons have a responsibility to understand how factors such as patient demographics, the social environment, clinician awareness, and the health care system are associated with inequitable patient outcomes. Through education, we can empower surgeons to advocate for their patients, address the causes and consequences of surgical disparities, and incorporate social responsibility into their daily practice. Conclusions and Relevance: One of the greatest challenges in the field of surgery is ensuring that surgical care is provided in an equitable and sustainable way. Surgeons have a duty to understand the factors that lead to health care disparities and use their knowledge, skills, and privileged position to address these issues at the individual and societal level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0621

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A spotlight on structural inequities and resultant health disparities, laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic, has pushed physician advocacy to the forefront of national conversation.

    “Since this initial review 5 years ago, a spotlight on structural inequities and resultant health disparities, laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic, has pushed physician advocacy to the forefront of national conversation35–37, and many programs have published their GME advocacy curricula, sharing creative solutions to barriers as well as lessons learned in curricular implementation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janeway, M., Wilson, S., Sanchez, S. E., Arora, T. K., & Dechert, T.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
157
Issue
6
Pages
532
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226414664
Cited by
31
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
social responsibility, surgery, social determinants of health, health care disparities, surgical outcomes, access to surgical care, medical ethics, social contract, justice, benevolence, health equity, surgeon education
MeSH terms
Citizenship, Humans, Social Responsibility, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review