Cited by 30Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Neoadjuvant Semaglutide, Bariatric Surgery Weight Loss, and Overall Outcomes

Open access
Mathur, Vasundhara, Wasden, Katherine, Shin, Thomas H., Medhati, Pourya, Nimeri, Abdelrahman A., Tavakkoli, Ali, Sheu, Eric G.·2025·JAMA Surgery

Abstract

This case-control study examines the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist before metabolic and bariatric surgery and its postoperative outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathur, V., Wasden, K., Shin, T. H., Medhati, P., Nimeri, A. A., Tavakkoli, A., & Sheu, E. G.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
JAMA Surgery
Published
2025-05-01
Volume
160
Issue
5
Pages
594
ISSN
2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408245863
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13
FWCI
28.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
semaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, neoadjuvant therapy, bariatric surgery, weight loss, metabolic surgery, postoperative outcomes, obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review