Cited by 11Global Health and SurgeryHealth and Medical EducationInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking Global Health to Local Health within an Ob/Gyn Residency Program

Open access
Sara Whetstone, Meg Autry·2018·AMA Journal of Ethics

Abstract

An unprecedented number of medical students and residents express the desire to participate in global health work during their training and beyond. Preparing learners for work in underserved settings makes it more likely that they will continue to work in areas of need. Training programs that focus on global health have been criticized as there is ample work to be done in the US, and often global health work becomes learner-centric, which is difficult to maintain and potentially burdensome and harmful to the host site. In this article, we discuss a curriculum and training program that intentionally prepares learners to work responsibly and collaboratively in low-resource settings, both nationally and globally.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.medu1-1803

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Whetstone, S., & Autry, M.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
AMA Journal of Ethics
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
253-260
ISSN
  • 1937-7010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-6980
OpenAlex
W2794131340
Cited by
11
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AMA Journal of Ethic (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
global health, local health, obstetrics and gynecology residency, medical curriculum, resource-limited settings, underserved populations, residency training, global health workforce
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Curriculum, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Female, Gynecology, Health Resources, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, International Educational Exchange, Internship and Residency, Learning, Obstetrics, Physicians, Pregnancy, Social Responsibility, Students, Medical, United States, Work, Global Health, Dissent and Disputes, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review