The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions
Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2017) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740 · Cited by 804
Protective factors against bullying and cyberbullying: A systematic review of meta-analyses
Zych, I., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.008 · Cited by 585
Risk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency: key findings from longitudinal studies
Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2010) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371005501003 · Cited by 529
Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12861 · Cited by 316
Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Wunder, S., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Moreno-Sanchez, R. D. P. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149847 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Venue
- Campbell Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06-26
- ISSN
- 1891-1803 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4246941563
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(issn)1891-1803
- The paper
- Campbell Systematic Reviews. (2019). Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/(issn)1891-1803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
