Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,659

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union

Open access
·2018·Eos

Abstract

Arctic climate encompasses multiple feed-backs, the most important of which is the ice-albedo feedback. Enhanced Arctic changes, fi rst recognized in the nineteenth century, increasingly are being observed across ter-restrial, oceanic, atmospheric, and human systems, inspiring interdisciplinary research efforts, including the Study of Environmental Arctic Change (SEARCH) program, to under-stand the nature and future development of the Arctic system. In response to the need for enhanced understanding outlined in the 2005 SEARCH

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(issn)2324-9250

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Venue
Eos
Published
2018-08-05
ISSN
0096-3941 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206743603
Cited by
1,659
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(issn)2324-9250
The paper
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. (2018). Eos. https://doi.org/10.1002/(issn)2324-9250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.