Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Major depression, minor depression, and double depression: are they distinct clinical entities?

Remick, R. A., Sadovnick, A. D., Lam, R. W., Zis, A. P., Yee, I. M. L.·1996·American Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Our study was designed to identify the underlying symptomatologic structure common to major psychoses as a preliminary step for a phenotype definition. We investigated 1,004 inpatients affected by mood disorders or the schizophrenia spectrum (DSM-III-R) using the OPCRIT checklist (operational criteria checklist for psychotic illness). Symptomatologic structure was extracted by factor analytic techniques and factor scores were first obtained on 500 subjects. A CFA (confirmatory factor analysis) was then conducted on the remaining 504 subjects to evaluate fitness of the model. We identified four factors: excitement, depression, disorganization, and delusion. These factors accounted for 54.6% of the total variance of the OPCRIT checklist symptomatologic subset of 38 items. CFA indices showed a good fit for the model. We identified symptomatologic structures common to major psychoses. The factors identified were confirmed in an independent sample. Two of these symptomatologic structures are partially overlapping with categorical diagnoses (excitement and depression), and two constitute independent psychopathologic traits (delusion and disorganization). The use of "factor-derived scores" in genetic research may add a dimensional definition to the diagnostic subdivision of major psychoses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19960726)67:4<347::aid-ajmg6>3.0.co;2-j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Metadata

Authors
Remick, R. A., Sadovnick, A. D., Lam, R. W., Zis, A. P., & Yee, I. M. L.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics
Published
1996

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major depression, minor depression, and double depression: are they distinct clinical entities? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19960726)67:4
The paper
Remick, R. A., Sadovnick, A. D., Lam, R. W., Zis, A. P., & Yee, I. M. L. (1996). Major depression, minor depression, and double depression: are they distinct clinical entities? American Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19960726)67%3A4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.