The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Candida albicans homologue ofGGP1/GAS1 gene is functional inSaccharomyces cerevisiae and contains the determinants for glycosylphosphatidylinositol attachment
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Phr1p is responsible of glucan remodeling at neutral-alkaline pH and is essential for morphogenesis and virulence.”
From Genomic and functional analyses unveil the response to hyphal wall stress in Candida albicans cells lacking β(1,3)-glucan remodeling (2016) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Phr1p and Phr2p are highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gas1p, they share the same activity in vitro and PHR1 complements gas1Δ mutation [15, 16].”
From Genomic and functional analyses unveil the response to hyphal wall stress in Candida albicans cells lacking β(1,3)-glucan remodeling (2016) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“GAS1, GAS2, and GAS5 are glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell surface proteins [122], which are involved in the production of β-1,3 glucan in C. glabrata [123].”
From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [122]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Vai, M., Orlandi, I., Cavadini, P., Alberghina, L., & Popolo, L.
- Venue
- Yeast
- Published
- 1996
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
