The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, activation during processing of syntactically complex sentences was also assigned to area 45 (triangular part) in studies using semantic plausibility judgment tasks or sentence picture-matching tasks [22],[23].”
From Broca's Region: Novel Organizational Principles and Multiple Receptor Mapping (2010) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“There was continued emphasis on the importance of Broca's area (BA 44 and sometimes BA 45) for syntactic processing (Caplan et al., 1998,1999; Inui et al., 1998; Kang et al., 1999; Moro et al., 2001; Nakai et al., 1999; Ni et al., 2000) even when articulation was suppressed (Caplan et al., 2000).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Caplan et al., 2000
In the citing paper
“The reduced connectivity with temporal cortex areas in which objects and faces are represented was interpreted as contributing to the reduced positive valuation of signals involved in emotion such as the sight of face expressions, and of people (Hasselmo et al., 1989; Critchley et al., 2000).”
From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Critchley et al., 2000
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Caplan, D., Alpert, N., Waters, G., & Olivieri, A.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Published
- 2000
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200002)9:2
- The paper
- Caplan, D., Alpert, N., Waters, G., & Olivieri, A. (2000). Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200002)9%3A2
