The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, only three studies accounted for competing risks in their analyses, which is important to prevent risk overestimation.51”
From Impact of Age at Primary Breast Cancer on Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers (2016) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Missing data, especially when it involves a risk factor or event, is particularly problematic in survival analyses (van Buuren et al., 1999).”
From Weaknesses in executive functioning predict the initiating of adolescents' alcohol use (2015) · cites this paper as van Buuren et al., 1999
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- van Buuren, S., Boshuizen, H. C., & Knook, D. L.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Published
- 1999
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
