Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK

WADDOCK, SANDRA A., GRAVES, SAMUEL B.·1997·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

Organizational research has revealed ample evidence of self-serving attributional patterns in managerial sensemaking, but has not yet resolved whether actor–observer attributional effects also influence managers’ sensemaking tendencies. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether such actor–observer effects can be detected in managers’ interpretation of equivocal information. Results indicate that managers receiving equivocal information about the performance of an organization described as their own credited positive outcomes to organizational strengths and blamed negative outcomes on environmental threats. In contrast, managers receiving equivocal information about an organization described as managed by others associated positive outcomes with environmental opportunities and linked negative outcomes to organizational weaknesses. Both self-serving and actor–observer attributional patterns were thus detected. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::aid-smj869>3.0.co;2-g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Metadata

Authors
WADDOCK, S. A., & GRAVES, S. B.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Published
1997

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199704)18:4
The paper
WADDOCK, S. A., & GRAVES, S. B. (1997). THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199704)18%3A4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.