THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK

WADDOCK, SANDRA A., GRAVES, SAMUEL B.·1997·Strategic Management Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::aid-smj869>3.0.co;2-g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relation between CSR and financial performance could run from financial performance to CSR, as firms that do well are more likely to engage in CSR.

    “The relation could therefore run the other way, from financial performance to CSR, in the sense that firms that do well are more likely to engage in CSR (e.g., Waddock and Graves 1997; Margolis et al. 2009).”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Waddock and Graves 1997

  • Organisations with CSR activities can benefit from empowering and encouraging their staff's commitment and productivity.

    “Quite parallel to what this research paper aims to confirm, Waddock (1997) notes that organisations with CSR activities can benefit from empowering and encouraging their staff's commitment and productivity.”

    From Corporate social responsibility influences employee engagement (2018) · cites this paper as Waddock (1997)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Authors
WADDOCK, S. A., & GRAVES, S. B.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Published
1997

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review