A metacognitive model and therapy for generalized anxiety disorder
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study did not assess all available cognitive-behavioral theories of GAD, such as the interpersonal processes of Borkovec, Newman, and Castonguay (2003) and Wells' (1999) cognitive model.
“We also did not assess all of the available cognitive-behavioral theories of GAD, such as the interpersonal processes highlighted by Borkovec, Newman, and Castonguay (2003), and the cognitive model outlined by Wells (1999).”
From Acceptance-based behavioral therapy for GAD: effects on outcomes from three theoretical models. (2011) · cites this paper as Wells (1999)
Worriers describe worrying as aversive but also endorse positive beliefs about worry.
“Despite concomitant reports that worriers describe the process of worrying as aversive (Ruscio & Borkovec, 2004; Wells, 1995), they also endorse positive beliefs about worry; that it might help them prepare for, problem solve, or superstitiously avoid future catastrophic events (e.g., Borkovec, Hazlett-Stevens, & Diaz, 1999).”
From Distress and avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: Exploring the relationships with intolerance of uncertainty and worry (2010) · cites this paper as Borkovec, Hazlett-Stevens, & Diaz, 1999
A drop in negative emotion, like relief when the feared outcome fails to happen, strengthens worry.
“Experiencing a decrease in negative emotions, such as relief when the feared outcome doesn't occur (which is the case 84% of the time; Borkovec, Hazlett-Stevens, & Diaz, 1999), serves to reinforce the worry.”
From A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: A review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry (2011) · cites this paper as Borkovec et al., 1999
People who worry excessively report that worrying helps them solve problems, prepare for outcomes, prevent negative outcomes, and reduce emotional reactions to negative outcomes.
“Furthermore, excessive worriers report that worrying helps them to problem solve, prepare for potential outcomes, prevent negative outcomes from occurring, and minimize emotional reactions to negative outcomes (Borkovec, Hazlett-Stevens, & Diaz, 1999; Freeston, Rhéaume, Letarte, Dugas, & Ladouceur, 1994).”
From Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Common Factor in the Treatment of Emotional Disorders (2013) · cites this paper as Borkovec, Hazlett-Stevens, & Diaz, 1999
Several studies pointed out the impact that dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs can have on mental health.
“Several studies pointed out the impact that those dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs can have on mental health [26–30].”
From Association between time perspective and metacognition among Lebanese adults: the mediating role of mindfulness (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
Cognitive models of GAD hold that cognitive factors such as intolerance of uncertainty, metacognitive beliefs, and cognitive avoidance maintain the disorder.
“Cognitive theories of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) posit that cognitive and behavioural factors maintain the disorder.”
From The Mediating Relationship between Maladaptive Behaviours, Cognitive Factors, and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Symptoms (2018) · cites this paper as Wells, 1999
One of the longest standing accounts of OCD symptomatology is that compulsions are not habits but rather are rational avoidance responses triggered by irrational beliefs.
“One of the longest standing accounts of OCD symptomatology is that compulsions are not habits but rather are rational avoidance responses triggered by irrational beliefs 5, 6, 7.”
From Enhanced avoidance habits in obsessive-compulsive disorder (2014) · cites this paper as [6]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Wells, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-138
- ISSN
- 1063-3995
- 1099-0879
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review