The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
The TAPS project 40: quality of care provisions for the elderly mentally ill?traditional vs alternative facilities
Abstract
Current diagnostic criteria for Alcohol Related Dementia (ARD) are based almost exclusively on clinical judgment. Moreover, there are no guidelines available to assist the clinician or the researcher in distinguishing Alcohol Related Dementia from other causes of dementia such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, this distinction may have implications for the prognosis and treatment of patients. In this article, provisional diagnostic criteria for establishing a diagnosis of Alcohol Related Dementia are proposed for further study. The criteria are based on the available literature on the relationship between alcohol consumption and dementia and were modeled after existing diagnostic criteria for AD and Vascular Dementia. Validity of these criteria for distinguishing AD from ARD will require further study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alcohol use has been identified as a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline.”
From Alcohol use and dementia: a systematic scoping review (2019) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Wills, W., Trieman, N., & Leff, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Published
- 1998
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The TAPS project 40: quality of care provisions for the elderly mentally ill?traditional vs alternative facilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199804)13:4
- The paper
- Wills, W., Trieman, N., & Leff, J. (1998). The TAPS project 40: quality of care provisions for the elderly mentally ill?traditional vs alternative facilities. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199804)13%3A4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
