Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Improving biosensor analysis

Myszka, David G.·1999·Journal of Molecular Recognition

Abstract

The interaction of two molecules binding to each other is described by two rate parameters, the association rate parameter k(a) and the dissociation rate parameter k(d). Under standardized conditions these kinetic parameters can be determined by analysis of their interaction in an affinity-based biosensor system, such as BIACORE(R) 3000. The association rate describes the collision frequency and the attraction between two molecules and the dissociation rate describes the stability of the molecular complex. By comparing the affinity of different molecules (calculated as the quotient of the association rate parameter and the dissociation rate parameter), an estimation of specificity can be obtained. For dissociation, two different aspects can be considered-the practical aspect, where one is interested in separating the two molecules, and the informative aspect, where one is interested in the reasons for the dissociation event. This review focuses on a method that was designed to solve the practical problem of regeneration, but eventually produced a considerable amount of information about the interactions themselves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199909/10)12:5<279::aid-jmr473>3.0.co;2-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Metadata

Authors
Myszka, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Recognition
Published
1999

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving biosensor analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199909/10)12:5
The paper
Myszka, D. G. (1999). Improving biosensor analysis. Journal of Molecular Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199909/10)12%3A5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.