The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Improving biosensor analysis
Abstract
The interaction of two molecules binding to each other is described by two rate parameters, the association rate parameter k(a) and the dissociation rate parameter k(d). Under standardized conditions these kinetic parameters can be determined by analysis of their interaction in an affinity-based biosensor system, such as BIACORE(R) 3000. The association rate describes the collision frequency and the attraction between two molecules and the dissociation rate describes the stability of the molecular complex. By comparing the affinity of different molecules (calculated as the quotient of the association rate parameter and the dissociation rate parameter), an estimation of specificity can be obtained. For dissociation, two different aspects can be considered-the practical aspect, where one is interested in separating the two molecules, and the informative aspect, where one is interested in the reasons for the dissociation event. This review focuses on a method that was designed to solve the practical problem of regeneration, but eventually produced a considerable amount of information about the interactions themselves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All double-referenced data (55) presented are representative of duplicate injections acquired from at least 3 independent trials.”
From Allosteric folding correction of F508del and rare CFTR mutants by elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (Trikafta) combination (2020) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Myszka, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Recognition
- Published
- 1999
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving biosensor analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199909/10)12:5
- The paper
- Myszka, D. G. (1999). Improving biosensor analysis. Journal of Molecular Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(199909/10)12%3A5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.