Absolute Asymmetric Synthesis: The Origin, Control, and Amplification of Chirality

Feringa, Ben L., van Delden, Richard A.·1999·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19991203)38:23<3418::aid-anie3418>3.0.co;2-v

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several proposed mechanisms for the origin of enantioenriched chirality, such as circularly polarized light, quartz, and absolute asymmetric synthesis, typically induce very small enantiomeric excess, and their correlation to highly enantioenriched compounds is unclear.

    “Several theories and mechanisms such as circularly polarized light, quartz, and absolute asymmetric synthesis have been proposed in relation to the origin of the enantioenriched chirality of organic compounds.2–10) However, in most cases, the enantiomeric excess (ee) induced by those mechanisms has been very small, and the correlation to the highly enantioenriched compounds has remained unclear.”
  • In most proposed theories of the origin of chirality, the induced ee is very low, and in some theories the induced enantioenrichments are below detection level.

    “In most cases, the ee induced by the proposed theories of the origin of chirality has been very low. Moreover, in some of the proposed theories, the induced enantioenrichments are below detection level.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Authors
Feringa, B. L., & van Delden, R. A.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Published
1999

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review