The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline
Open accessAbstract
This unit describes how to use BWA and the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) to map genome sequencing data to a reference and produce high‐quality variant calls that can be used in downstream analyses. The complete workflow includes the core NGS data‐processing steps that are necessary to make the raw data suitable for analysis by the GATK, as well as the key methods involved in variant discovery using the GATK. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform . 43:11.10.1‐11.10.33. © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The best practices recommended by the Broad Institute for variant calling were then followed (Van der Auwera et al., 2013).”
From Loss of epigenetic information as a cause of mammalian aging (2023) · cites this paper as Van der Auwera et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110 · Cited by 27,895
Self-citationggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491 · Cited by 14,320
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
DePristo, M. A., Banks, E., Poplin, R. E., Garimella, K. V., Maguire, J., Hartl, C., Philippakis, A., del Angel, G., Rivas, M. A., Hanna, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.806 · Cited by 11,457
Self-citationA map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Self-citationdbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation
Sherry, S. T. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.308 · Cited by 7,502
Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations
The International HapMap 3 Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09298 · Cited by 3,026
On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P
Fisher, R. A. (1922) · Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2340521 · Cited by 2,975
An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome
Mills, R. E., Luttig, C. T., Larkins, C. E., Beauchamp, A., Tsui, C., Pittard, W. S., & Devine, S. E. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.4565806 · Cited by 673
On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P
Fisher, R. A. (2018) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.2397-2335.1922.tb00768.x · Cited by 218
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans
Karczewski, K. J., Francioli, L. C., Tiao, G., Cummings, B. B., Alföldi, J., Wang, Q., Collins, R. L., Laricchia, K. M., Ganna, A., Birnbaum, D. P., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · Cited by 9,434
Self-citationThe nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines
Ewels, P., Peltzer, A., Fillinger, S., Patel, H., Alneberg, J., Wilm, A., Garcia, M., Tommaso, P. D., & Nahnsen, S. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x · Cited by 4,265
Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia
Ghandi, M., Huang, F. W., Jané-Valbuena, J., Kryukov, G. V., Lo, C. C., McDonald, E. R., Barretina, J., Gelfand, E. T., Bielski, C. M., Li, H., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1186-3 · Cited by 3,394
The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients
Matson, V., Fessler, J., Bao, R., Chongsuwat, T., Zha, Y., Alegre, M.-L., Luke, J. J., & Gajewski, T. F. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao3290 · Cited by 3,107
Puram, S. V., Tirosh, I., Parikh, A. S., Patel, A. P., Yizhak, K., Gillespie, S., Rodman, C., Luo, C. L., Mroz, E. A., Emerick, K. S., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.044 · Cited by 2,557
Metadata
- Authors
- Van der Auwera, G. A., Carneiro, M. O., Hartl, C., Poplin, R., del Angel, G., Levy‐Moonshine, A., Jordan, T., Shakir, K., Roazen, D., Thibault, J., Banks, E., Garimella, K. V., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., & DePristo, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Genome Sequencing and Analysis Group Broad Institute Cambridge Massachusetts
- Broad Institute (US)
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Current Protocols in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11.10.1-11.10.33
- ISSN
- 1934-3396 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-340X
- PMC
- PMC4243306
- OpenAlex
- W1919257374
- Cited by
- 6,687
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 342 · 2025: 559 · 2024: 677 · 2023: 662 · 2022: 729 · 2021: 877 · 2020: 716 · 2019: 648 · 2018: 528 · 2017: 416 · 2016: 293 · 2015: 168 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 78.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Protocols in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG003067, U01HG006569)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- variant calling, GATK, BWA, genome alignment, next-generation sequencing data processing, variant discovery, reference genome mapping, bioinformatics pipeline
- MeSH terms
- Calibration, Haploidy, Haplotypes, Humans, Software, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Sequence Alignment, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Databases, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review