Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Uptake and Metabolism of Organic Compounds: Green‐Liver Model

Burken, J. G.·2003·Phytoremediation

Abstract

Plant metabolism of organic compounds is a vital phytoremediation process for sustainable waste management. Metabolism appears to follow detoxification or elimination metabolic processes, which are collectively called the “green-liver” model. For this metabolism to take place, the compounds must enter plant tissues; therefore uptake of organic compounds is also covered, with specific applications for phytoremediation. Plant metabolism of organic compounds shares many processes with mammalian liver function, including (1) the capability to detoxify contaminants, (2) the specific enzymatic pathways, and (3) removal of the compounds from the susceptible organelles. The similarities extend to the very structure of the enzymes involved. The major difference is in the ultimate fate—storage as opposed to excretion in mammals. By understanding the processes that occur within the plants used in phytoremediation, a better knowledge of the potential ecological impacts can be gained. Furthermore, new applications can be developed with the knowledge of plant metabolism and, through molecular engineering techniques, a new paradigm in the plant metabolism of contaminants and phytoremediation should result.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/047127304x.ch2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Burken, J. G.
Venue
Phytoremediation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-26
Pages
59-84
OpenAlex
W1561506490
Cited by
178
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake and Metabolism of Organic Compounds: Green‐Liver Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/047127304x.ch2
The paper
Burken, J. G. (2003). Uptake and Metabolism of Organic Compounds: Green‐Liver Model. Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1002/047127304x.ch2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.