The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: Correlation with cognitive severity
DeKosky, S. T., & Scheff, S. W. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410270502 · Cited by 2,376
Lakens, D. (2022) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.33267 · Cited by 1,962
A Critique and Improvement of the CL Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong
Vargha, A., & Delaney, H. D. (2000) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986025002101 · Cited by 938
Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., Spinrad, T. L., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., & Liew, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00897.x · Cited by 895
A meta-analysis of hypnotically induced analgesia: How effective is hypnosis
Montgomery, G. H., Duhamel, K. N., & Redd, W. H. (2000) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207140008410045 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Venue
- Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-31
- Pages
- 107-139
- ISSN
- 1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1515487220
- Cited by
- 2,325
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471458503.ch4
- The paper
- Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. (2003). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471458503.ch4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
