The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x · Cited by 1,796
Methodology for Assessing the Resilience of Networked Infrastructure
Reed, D. A., Kapur, K. C., & Christie, R. D. (2009) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2009.2017396 · Cited by 503
Haimes, Y. Y., Horowitz, B. M., Lambert, J. H., Santos, J. R., Lian, C., & Crowther, K. G. (2005) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:2(67 · Cited by 420
Self-citationOn the Definition of Vulnerabilities in Measuring Risks to Infrastructures
Haimes, Y. Y. (2006) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00755.x · Cited by 262
Self-citationEstimating a system's mean time-to-compromise
Leversage, D. J., & Byres, E. J. (2008) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.9 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Haimes, Y. Y.
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-29
- OpenAlex
- W2481862705
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471723908
- The paper
- Haimes, Y. Y. (2004). Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471723908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
