Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Scale for Suicide Ideation: Psychometric properties of a self-report version

Beck, Aaron T., Steer, Robert A., Ranieri, William F.·1988·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This pilot study follows in the tradition of Jahoda in arguing that the study of the lives of psychologically healthy individuals can add to our understanding of mental health. The Personal Orientation Inventory (POI) is used to identify four psychologically healthy middle-aged adults. The subjects also were asked to respond in essay form to a written open-ended question with regard to their beliefs as to the factors that have assisted them in living more effective lives. An idiographic approach is pursued in which the subjects' responses to the POI and the open-ended question are analyzed. It is noted that while the circumstances of the subjects' lives are diverse, there are seven basic commonalities in their behavioral approach to life tasks. It is conjectured that these behavioral qualities may be universal for emotionally healthy individuals and that future research with larger samples may bear this out.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/1097-4679(198807)44:4<499::aid-jclp2270440404>3.0.co;2-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Metadata

Authors
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Ranieri, W. F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Published
1988

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scale for Suicide Ideation: Psychometric properties of a self-report version. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/1097-4679(198807)44:4
The paper
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Ranieri, W. F. (1988). Scale for Suicide Ideation: Psychometric properties of a self-report version. Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198807)44%3A4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.