Risk for domestic violence: factors associated with perpetration and victimization

Riggs, David S., Caulfield, Marie B., Street, Amy E.·2000·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/1097-4679(200010)56:10<1289::aid-jclp4>3.0.co;2-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both perpetration of and victimization by physical violence in marital relationships are significantly associated with depression; longitudinal studies find pre-marital mental disorders predict subsequent marital violence perpetration and victimization, but few studies adjusted for comorbidity, and in the WMH surveys the association between premarital major depressive disorder and marital violence

    “Considerable research documents that both perpetration of and victimization by physical violence in marital relationships are significantly associated with depression.44 While these studies have generally focused on presumed mental health consequences of relationship violence,45–47 a growing body of research has more recently suggested that marital violence is partly a consequence of pre-existing”

    From The Costs of Depression (2012) · cites this paper as [50]

  • The burden associated with depression increases sharply in the second and third decades of life, and is mostly carried by the populations in middle-income countries.

    “The burden associated with depression increases sharply in the second and third decades of life, and is mostly carried by the populations in middle-income countries (Figure 4).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Authors
Riggs, D. S., Caulfield, M. B., & Street, A. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Published
2000

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review