The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FEV1 as a guide to lung transplant referral in young patients with cystic fibrosis
Abstract
The incidence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is 1:1,200-5, 000, and the condition is associated with high mortality and morbidity attributed principally to associated pulmonary hypoplasia. One treatment approach has been for intrauterine intervention to induce lung growth to a sufficient level to allow survival at birth. Repair of the hernia in utero has been attempted, using a method of immediate reduction and repair of the hernia (patch) compared to a slow reduction method using a silastic "silo" sewn over the diaphragm defect to contain the hernial contents. In animal studies, this second method has been associated with lower fetal morbidity and mortality. This study, utilizing the sheep model of CDH, focuses on analysis of lung structural development and maturation, comparing the efficacy of the immediate vs. slow methods of hernial repair in preventing/reversing pulmonary hypoplasia. We hypothesized that: a) Both the immediate (patch) and slow (silo) methods of hernia repair performed in the lamb model of CDH will stimulate lung growth and structural development and restore lung structure and maturity towards normal levels by term gestation; b) Effects will be detectable by morphometric measurement of the following parameters: lung volume; parenchyma to nonparenchyma tissue ratio; volume density of connective tissue in nonparenchyma; gas exchange tissue to airspace ratio; gas exchange surface area; capillary loading; alveolar/airspace density; and alveolar perimeter; c) Effects will be seen in all lobes of the lung; and d) There will be no significant difference in lung size or structural parameters between the two groups. Forty-four pregnant ewes were allocated randomly to one of four groups. Fetal lambs in three groups (n = 36) underwent CDH creation at days 72-74 of gestation. Of surviving lambs showing an adequate hernia, 9 were not operated on further, 11 underwent "repair" using a silastic chimney around the hernial contents (slow reduction), and 11 underwent "repair" by a silastic patch over the diaphragmatic defect (immediate reduction). The fourth group were normal controls. All surviving lambs (n = 8 in each group) were delivered by Cesarian section at 141-143 days (term = 145-149 days). Lungs were obtained at autopsy, inflation-fixed, divided into lobes, and sampled, and morphometric analysis was performed. Comparisons were made between these groups and with matched normal controls and CDH untreated animals prepared in conjunction and previously reported. The lungs from the CDH animals treated by both methods of fetal hernia repair showed significant lung growth and structural development and maturation, although they remained significantly hypoplastic compared to normal. There were minor differences in the lung parameters between these two groups, with a tendency for the slow method to provide more normal parameter values. An exception was the increase in lung volume that was greater for the immediate (patch) method, particularly in the left lower lobe. In conclusion, intrauterine hernia repair by both methods is capable of partially reversing total lung and lobar structural hypoplasia and immaturity. The slow reduction method, with reduced potential for mortality and morbidity, is at least as good at reversing pulmonary hypoplasia as the immediate method. Alternative intrauterine interventions to prevent or reverse pulmonary hypoplasia are discussed and compared with the hernia repair methods used in this study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Independent of FEV1, the following factors have been associated with increasing risk of disease progression or death: frequent or severe exacerbations, massive hemoptysis requiring bronchial artery embolization, pneumothorax, malnutrition, low six-minute walk distance, and younger age upon development of advanced disease.(247, 252–260)”
From Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. (2021) · cites this paper as [260]
Citations
Cites
Stocks, J., & Quanjer, P. (1995) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.95.08030492 · Cited by 688
Gehr, P., Mwangi, D. K., Ammann, A., Maloiy, G. M. O., Richard Taylor, C., & Weibel, E. R. (1981) · Respiration Physiology · doi:10.1016/0034-5687(81)90077-3 · Cited by 288
Risk of death in cystic fibrosis patients with severely compromised lung function
Milla, C. E., & Warwick, W. J. (1998) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.113.5.1230 · Cited by 167
Cited by
Leard, L. E., Holm, A. M., Valapour, M., Glanville, A. R., Attawar, S., Aversa, M., Campos, S. V., Christon, L. M., Cypel, M., Dellgren, G., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2021.07.005 · Cited by 821
Developing cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral criteria using predictors of 2-year mortality
Mayer-Hamblett, N., Rosenfeld, M., Emerson, J., Goss, C. H., & Aitken, M. L. (2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200202-087oc · Cited by 269
Ramos, K. J., Smith, P. J., McKone, E. F., Pilewski, J. M., Lucy, A., Hempstead, S. E., Tallarico, E., Faro, A., Rosenbluth, D. B., Gray, A. L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.03.002 · Cited by 227
Solé, A., Pérez, I., Vázquez, I., Pastor, A., Escrivá, J., Sales, G., Hervás, D., Glanville, A. R., & Quittner, A. L. (2016) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1233 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, W., & Waltz, D. A.
- Venue
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Published
- 2000
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.