Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mass media have been used as a way of delivering preventive health messages. They have the potential to reach and to modify the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of a large proportion of the community. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of mass media interventions to prevent smoking in young people in terms of reduced smoking uptake, in addition to secondary outcomes including improved smoking outcomes, attitudes, behaviours, knowledge, self-efficacy and perception. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register and conducted additional searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE in July 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials, controlled trials without randomization and time series studies that assessed the effectiveness of mass media campaigns (defined as channels of communication such as television, radio, newspapers, bill boards, posters, leaflets or booklets intended to reach large numbers of people and which are not dependent on person to person contact) in influencing the smoking behaviour (either objective or self-reported) of young people under the age of 25 years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information relating to the characteristics and the content of media interventions, participants, outcomes, methods of the study and risk of bias was abstracted by two independent reviewers. Studies were combined using qualitative narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS: Seven out of a total of 84 studies reporting information about mass media smoking campaigns met all of the inclusion criteria. All seven studies used a controlled trial design. Three studies concluded that mass media reduced the smoking behaviour of young people. All of the effective campaigns had a solid theoretical basis, used formative research in designing the campaign messages, and message broadcast was of reasonable intensity over extensive periods of time. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that mass media can prevent the uptake of smoking in young people, however the evidence is not strong and contains a number of methodological flaws.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective media campaigns had a solid theoretical basis, used formative research in designing the campaign messages, and message broadcast was of reasonable intensity over extensive period of time.
“The review further suggests that effective media campaigns had a solid theoretical basis, used formative research in designing the campaign messages, and message broadcast was of reasonable intensity over extensive period of time.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
The evidence that mass media interventions can prevent smoking uptake in young people is not strong and contains a number of methodological flaws.
“and suggests that mass media can prevent the uptake of smoking in young people; however, the evidence is not strong and contains a number of methodological flaws.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
Mass media interventions can prevent the uptake of smoking in young people.
“and suggests that mass media can prevent the uptake of smoking in young people; however, the evidence is not strong and contains a number of methodological flaws.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 145 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Brinn, M. P., Carson, K. V., Esterman, A. J., Chang, A. B., & Smith, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Charles Darwin University (AU)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2010-11-10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- CD001006-CD001006
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4244806241
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 145
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2017-06-02)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- mass media interventions, smoking prevention, youth, smoking uptake, anti-smoking campaigns, health communication, formative research, self-efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Age Factors, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Mass Media, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review