Inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for long-term therapy in cystic fibrosis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Inhaled antibiotics are commonly used to treat persistent airway infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa that contributes to lung damage in people with cystic fibrosis. Current guidelines recommend inhaled tobramycin for individuals with cystic fibrosis and persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection who are aged six years or older. The aim is to reduce bacterial load in the lungs so as to reduce inflammation and deterioration of lung function. This is an update of a previously published review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects long-term inhaled antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis on clinical outcomes (lung function, frequency of exacerbations and nutrition), quality of life and adverse events (including drug sensitivity reactions and survival). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched ongoing trials registries.Date of last search: 13 February 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected trials if inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotic treatment was used for at least three months in people with cystic fibrosis, treatment allocation was randomised or quasi-randomised, and there was a control group (either placebo, no placebo or another inhaled antibiotic). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected trials, judged the risk of bias, extracted data from these trials and judged the quality of the evidence using the GRADE system. MAIN RESULTS: ) % predicted was only found to be significantly improved with aztreonam lysine for inhalation compared to tobramycin (n = 273), mean difference -3.40% (95% CI -6.63 to -0.17). However, the method of defining the endpoint was different to the remaining trials and the participants were exposed to tobramycin for a long period making interpretation of the results problematic. No significant differences were found in the remaining comparisons with regard to lung function. Pulmonary exacerbations were measured in different ways, but one trial (n = 273) found that the number of people treated with antibiotics was lower in those receiving aztreonam than tobramycin, risk ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.86). We found the quality of evidence for these comparisons to be directly related to the risk of bias within the individual trials and varied from low to high. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotic treatment probably improves lung function and reduces exacerbation rate, but pooled estimates of the level of benefit were very limited. The best evidence is for inhaled tobramycin. More evidence from trials measuring similar outcomes in the same way is needed to determine a better measure of benefit. Longer-term trials are needed to look at the effect of inhaled antibiotics on quality of life, survival and nutritional outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As lung disease is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in people with CF, nebulised medications (or inhaled therapies) are usually prescribed, with multiple trials demonstrating their efficacy.
“As lung disease is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in people with CF, nebulised medications (or inhaled therapies) are usually prescribed (ECFS Patient Registry 2017), with multiple trials demonstrating their efficacy (Smith 2018; Yang 2018).”
From Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · cites this paper as Smith 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 201 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Smith, S., Rowbotham, N. J., & Regan, K. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- NHS Lothian (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-30
- Volume
- 2018
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- CD001021-CD001021
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC8407188
- OpenAlex
- W2795152494
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 201
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2022-11-14)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2013-12-007)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Keywords
- cystic fibrosis, inhaled antibiotics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, tobramycin, aztreonam, long-term antibiotic therapy, lung function, pulmonary exacerbations, quality of life, adverse drug reactions, survival, nutritional status, airway infection, risk of bias, quality of evidence, lung function decline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review