Cited by 459Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Psychosocial and psychological interventions for preventing postpartum depression

Dennis, Cindy-Lee, Dowswell, Therese·2013·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Epidemiological studies and meta‐analyses of predictive studies have consistently demonstrated the importance of psychosocial and psychological variables as postpartum depression risk factors. While interventions based on these variables may be effective treatment strategies, theoretically they may also be used in pregnancy and the early postpartum period to prevent postpartum depression. Objectives Primary: to assess the effect of diverse psychosocial and psychological interventions compared with usual antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum care to reduce the risk of developing postpartum depression. Secondary: to examine (1) the effectiveness of specific types of psychosocial and psychological interventions, (2) the effectiveness of professionally‐based versus lay‐based interventions, (3) the effectiveness of individually‐based versus group‐based interventions, (4) the effects of intervention onset and duration, and (5) whether interventions are more effective in women selected with specific risk factors. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2011), scanned secondary references and contacted experts in the field. We updated the search on 31 December 2012 and added the results to the awaiting classification section of the review for assessment at the next update. Selection criteria All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials of acceptable quality comparing a psychosocial or psychological intervention with usual antenatal, intrapartum, or postpartum care. Data collection and analysis Review authors and a research co‐ordinator with Cochrane review experience participated in the evaluation of methodological quality and data extraction. Additional information was sought from several trial researchers. Results are presented using risk ratio (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. Main results Twenty‐eight trials, involving almost 17,000 women, contributed data to the review. Overall, women who received a psychosocial or psychological intervention were significantly less likely to develop postpartum depression compared with those receiving standard care (average RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.93; 20 trials, 14,727 women). Several promising interventions include: (1) the provision of intensive, individualised postpartum home visits provided by public health nurses or midwives (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.73; two trials, 1262 women); (2) lay (peer)‐based telephone support (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.77; one trial, 612 women); and (3) interpersonal psychotherapy (standardised mean difference ‐0.27, 95% CI ‐0.52 to ‐0.01; five trials, 366 women). Professional‐ and lay‐based interventions were both effective in reducing the risk to develop depressive symptomatology. Individually‐based interventions reduced depressive symptomatology at final assessment (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 14 trials, 12,914 women) as did multiple‐contact interventions (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.93; 16 trials, 11,850 women). Interventions that were initiated in the postpartum period also significantly reduced the risk to develop depressive symptomatology (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90; 12 trials, 12,786 women). Identifying mothers 'at‐risk' assisted the prevention of postpartum depression (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88; eight trials, 1853 women). Authors' conclusions Overall, psychosocial and psychological interventions significantly reduce the number of women who develop postpartum depression. Promising interventions include the provision of intensive, professionally‐based postpartum home visits, telephone‐based peer support, and interpersonal psychotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd001134.pub3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 169 · Cited by 459

Authors
Dennis, C.-L., & Dowswell, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-28
Volume
2013
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4295827565
Cited by
459
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (10/4001/02, SRP/10/4001/02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
postpartum depression, prevention, psychosocial interventions, psychological intervention, postpartum home visits, peer support, telephone support, midwives, public health nurses, group intervention, individual interventions, risk factors, prenatal care, postpartum care, maternal mental health, perinatal mental health services, cost-effectiveness, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review