Cited by 103Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsReproductive tract infections research

Antibiotics for syphilis diagnosed during pregnancy

Open access
Walker, Godfrey JA·2001·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital syphilis is an increasing problem in many developing countries and in the transitional economies of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. In several countries this increase has been aggravated by HIV/AIDS. While the effectiveness of penicillin in the treatment of syphilis in pregnant women and the prevention of congenital syphilis was established shortly after the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s, there is uncertainty about the optimal treatment regimens. OBJECTIVES: To identify the most effective antibiotic treatment regimen (in terms of dose, length of course and mode of administration) of syphilis with and without concomitant infection with HIV for pregnant women infected with syphilis. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE 1966 to March 2000; EMBASE 1974 to March 2000, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (last searched March 2001), the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth group trials register (last searched March 2001) and the references of traditional reviews were searched. Experts in specialist units were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: It was planned that any trial in which an attempt is made to allocate treatment for syphilis during pregnancy by a random or quasi-random method would be included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information was extracted using a data extraction sheet and this included entry criteria, the source of controls, and whether the authors stratified by the stage of pregnancy when the diagnosis of syphilis was made. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty six studies met the criteria for detailed scrutiny. However, none of these met the pre-determined criteria for comparative groups and none included comparisons between randomly allocated groups of pregnant women. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: While there is no doubt that penicillin is effective in the treatment of syphilis in pregnancy and the prevention of congenital syphilis, uncertainty remains about what are the optimal treatment regimens. Further studies are needed to evaluate treatment failure cases with currently recommended regimens and this should include an assessment of the role of HIV infection in cases of prenatal syphilis treatment failure. The effectiveness of various antibiotic regimens for the treatment of primary and secondary syphilis in pregnant women need to be assessed using randomised controlled trials which compare them with existing recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd001143

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penicillin is effective in curing syphilis during pregnancy.

    “Penicillin is effective in curing syphilis during pregnancy, but more research is needed on the best dosage and duration of treatment for early syphilis. 47”
  • Evidence is insufficient to determine the optimal penicillin regimen during pregnancy.

    “Evidence is insufficient to determine the optimal penicillin regimen during pregnancy (640).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [640]

  • Erythromycin and azithromycin should not be used because neither reliably cures maternal infection nor treats an infected fetus.

    “Erythromycin and azithromycin should not be used because neither reliably cures maternal infection nor treats an infected fetus (640).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [640]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 235 · Cited by 103

Authors
Walker, G. J.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Walker, Godfrey JA
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07-23
Volume
2010
Issue
2
Pages
CD001143-CD001143
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2151175518
Cited by
103
References
235
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
maternal syphilis, congenital syphilis, penicillin, antibiotic regimens, HIV coinfection, treatment failure, primary and secondary syphilis
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Humans, Penicillins, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Syphilis, Syphilis, Congenital, HIV Infections, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review