The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: For centuries, there has been controversy around whether being upright (sitting, birthing stools, chairs, squatting) or lying down have advantages for women delivering their babies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and risks of the use of different positions during the second stage of labour (i.e. from full dilatation of the cervix). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (16 April 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials that used randomised or quasi-randomised allocation and appropriate follow up and compared various positions assumed by pregnant women during the second stage of labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently assessed the trials for inclusion and extracted the data. MAIN RESULTS: Results should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 19 included trials (5764 participants) was variable. Use of any upright or lateral position, compared with supine or lithotomy positions, was associated with: reduced duration of second stage of labour (10 trials: mean 4.29 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.95 to 5.64 minutes) - this was largely due to a considerable reduction in women allocated to the use of the birth cushion; a small reduction in assisted deliveries (18 trials: relative risk (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98); a reduction in episiotomies (12 trials: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91); an increase in second degree perineal tears (11 trials: RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.39); increased estimated blood loss greater than 500 ml (11 trials: RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.15); reduced reporting of severe pain during second stage of labour (1 trial: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.90); fewer abnormal fetal heart rate patterns (1 trial: RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.98). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The tentative findings of this review suggest several possible benefits for upright posture, with the possibility of increased risk of blood loss greater than 500 ml. Women should be encouraged to give birth in the position they find most comfortable. Until such time as the benefits and risks of various delivery positions are estimated with greater certainty, when methodologically stringent trials' data are available, women should be allowed to make informed choices about the birth positions in which they might wish to assume for delivery of their babies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews
Jones, L., Othman, M., Dowswell, T., Alfirevic, Z., Gates, S., Newburn, M., Jordan, S., Lavender, T., & Neilson, J. P. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009234.pub2 · Cited by 608
Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma
Aasheim, V., Nilsen, A. B. V., Reinar, L. M., & Lukasse, M. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006672.pub3 · Cited by 427
Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery
O'Mahony, F., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Menon, V. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005455.pub2 · Cited by 354
Self-citationRyu, D., Kim, D. H., Price, J. T., Lee, J. Y., Chung, H. U., Allen, E., Walter, J. R., Jeong, H., Cao, J., Kulikova, E., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2100466118 · Cited by 105
‘She would help me from the heart’: an ethnography of Egyptian women in labour
El-Nemer, A., Downe, S., & Small, N. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.016 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, J. K., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Smyth, R. M.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2004-01-26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD002006-CD002006
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1689651652
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd002006.pub2
- The paper
- Gupta, J. K., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Smyth, R. M. (2004). Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002006.pub2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.