Cited by 845Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Erosion and Treatment

Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents

Open access
Marinho, Valeria CC, Higgins, Julian, Logan, Stuart, Sheiham deceased, Aubrey·2003·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Fluoride toothpastes have been widely used for over three decades and remain a benchmark intervention for the prevention of dental caries. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and safety of fluoride toothpastes in the prevention of caries in children and to examine factors potentially modifying their effect. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (May 2000), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2000), plus several other databases. We handsearched journals, reference lists of articles and contacted selected authors and manufacturers. Selection criteria Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride toothpaste with placebo in children up to 16 years during at least one year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). Data collection and analysis Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF) that is the difference in caries increments between the treatment and control groups expressed as a percentage of the increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd002278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 195 · Cited by 845

Authors
Marinho, V. C., Higgins, J., Logan, S., & Sheiham deceased, A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London; Clinical and Diagnostic Oral Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry; Turner Street Whitechapel London UK E1 2AD
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University College London Medical School; London UK
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-20
Volume
2016
Issue
11
Pages
CD002278-CD002278
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2135508699
Cited by
845
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 48
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental Erosion and Treatment
Keywords
fluoride toothpaste, dental caries prevention, children, adolescents, caries increment, prevented fraction, fluoride concentration, toothbrushing frequency, caries risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Dental Caries, Fluorides, Humans, Toothpastes, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review