Cited by 151Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Vinpocetine for cognitive impairment and dementia

Open access
Szatmári, Szabolcs, Whitehouse, Peter·2003·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vinpocetine is a synthetic ethyl ester of apovincamine, a vinca alkaloid obtained from the leaves of the Lesser Periwinkle (Vinca minor) and discovered in the late 1960s. Although used in human treatment for over twenty years, it has not been approved by any regulatory body for the treatment of cognitive impairment. Basic sciences studies have been used to claim a variety of potentially important effects in the brain. However, despite these many proposed mechanisms and targets, the relevance of this basic science to clinical studies is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of vinpocetine in the treatment of patients with cognitive impairment due to vascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, mixed (vascular and Alzheimer's disease) and other dementias. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms vinpocetin*, cavinton, kavinton, Rgh-4405, Tcv-3B, "ethyl apovincaminate", vinRx, periwinkle, "myrtle vincapervinc" and cezayirmeneksesi. The manufacturers of vinpocetine were asked for information on trials of vinpocetine for dementia. In addition we tried to collect articles not listed in MEDLINE or other sources on the Internet (e.g. articles in Hungarian and Romanian). SELECTION CRITERIA: All human, unconfounded, double-blind, randomized trials in which treatment with vinpocetine was administered for more than a day and compared to control in patients with vascular dementia, Alzheimer's dementia or mixed Alzheimer's and vascular dementia and other dementias. Non-randomized trials were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted by the two reviewers (SzSz and PW) and cross-checked. Data from "washout" periods were not used for the analysis. For continuous or ordinal variables, such as cognitive test results, the main outcomes of interest were the change in score from baseline. The categorical outcome of global impression was transformed to binary data (improved or not improved) as was the occurrence of adverse effects; here the endpoint itself was of interest the Peto method of the "typical odds ratio" was used. A test for heterogeneity of treatment effects between the trials was made if appropriate. Data synthesis and analysis were performed using the Cochrane Review Manager software (RevMan version 4.1). MAIN RESULTS: All identified studies were performed before the 1990s and used various terms and criteria for cognitive decline and dementia. The three studies included in the review involved a total of 583 people with dementia treated with vinpocetine or placebo. The reports of these studies did not make possible any differentiation of effects for degenerative or vascular dementia. The results show benefit associated with treatment with vinpocetine 30mg/day and 60 mg/day compared with placebo, but the number of patients treated for 6 months or more was small. Only one study extended treatment to one year. Adverse effects were inconsistently reported and without regard for relationship to dose. The available data do not demonstrate many problems of adverse effects but intention-to-treat data were not available for any of the trials. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Although the basic science is interesting, the evidence for beneficial effect of vinpocetine on patients with dementia is inconclusive and does not support clinical use. The drug seems to have few adverse effects at the doses used in the studies. Large studies evaluating the use of vinpocetine for people suffering from well defined types of cognitive impairment are needed to explore possible efficacy of this treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation have not proven effective.

    “Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation so far have not proven effective.419,420”

    From Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2011) · cites this paper as [419]

    The Methods and Results sections describe trials comparing vinpocetine with placebo, and the Discussion concludes that evidence for vinpocetine's benefit is inconclusive. Searches for cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, and nonpharmacological interventions found no passage assessing whether either approach has proven effective. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Blaha L, Erzigkeit H, Adamczyk A, Freytag S, Schaltenbrand R. Clinical evidence of the effectiveness of vinpocetine in the treatment of organic psychosyndrome. Human Psychopharmacology 1989;4(2):103‐111. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fenzl E, Apecechea M, Schaltenbrand R, Friedel R. Long‐term study concerning tolerance and efficacy of vinpocetine in elderly patients suffering from a mild to moderate organic psychosyndrome. In: Bes A, Cahn J, Cahn R, Hoyer S, Marc‐Vergnes JP, Wisniewski HM editor(s). Senile dementias: early detection. London Paris: John Libby Eurotext, 1986:580‐585. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hindmarch I, Fuchs HH, Erzigkeit H. Efficacy and tolerance of vinpocetine in ambulant patients suffering from mild to moderate organic psychosyndromes. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1991;6(1):31‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Balestreri R, Fontana L, Astengo F. A double‐blind placebo controlled evaluation of the safety and efficacy of vinpocetine in the treatment of patients with chronic vascular senile cerebral dysfunction. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1987;35(5):425‐430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Filimonov VA, Kliueva VN, Kondrashova IN. Vinpotropile in the treatment of cerebral vascular diseases. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2007;2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ivanova NE, Panuntsev VS. The use of vinpotropile in chronic brain ishemia. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2008;1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kishimoto T, Hiraoka Y, Oribe H, Inoue M, Ueda A, Matsuyama M, Inoue Y, Itoh T, Yoshitomi K, Miyagi T, Masuda N, Tatsuda H, Nakanishi Y, Negoro H, Ikawa G. Auditory P300 event‐related potentials and mini mental state examination performance in dementia; effects of Idebenone and Vinpocetine. Journal of Nara Medical Association 1995;46(3):259‐266. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuznetsov AN, Daminov VD. Implication of vinpotropile in the treatment of patients with cerebral stroke. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2007, (Suppl 21):52‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manconi E, Binaghi F, Pitzus F. A double‐blind clinical trial of vinpocetine in the treatment of cerebral insufficiency of vascular and degenerative origin. Current Therapeutic Research 1986;40(4):702‐709. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nesterova MV, Grigor'eva AN. Effect of vinpocetin on cerebral hemodynamics, autoregulation and cognitive frustration in senile patients with a chronic brain ischemia. Eur J Neurology 2008;Supplement 1:261. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peruzza M, DeJacobis M. A double‐blind placebo controlled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of vinpocetine in the treatment of patients with chronic vascular or degenerative senile cerebral dysfunction. Advances in Therapeutics 1986;3(4):201‐209. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tanashyan MM, Lagoda OV, Fedin PA, Konovalov RN, Rodionova YV, Suslina ZA. The use of vinpocetine in the treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebrovascular diseases. Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni S S Korsakova 2007;107(10):41‐44. [Google Scholar]
  13. Thal LJ, Salmon DP, Lasker B, Bower D, Klauber MR. The safety and lack of efficacy of vinpocetine in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1989;37(6):515‐520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Valikovics A. Investigation of the effect of vinpocetine on cerebral blood flow and cognitive functions. Ideggyogy Sz. 2007;60:301‐310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vamosi B, Molnar L, Demeter J, Tury F. Comparative study of the effect of ethyl apovincaminate and xantinol nicotinate in cerebrovascular diseases. Immediate drug effects on the concentrations of carbohydrate metabolites and electrolytes in blood and CSF. Arzneimittelforschung 1976;26(10a):1980‐1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wolters EC, Scheltens P, Zawrt J, et al. A double blind placebo and piracetam controlled multicenter trial of vinpocetine in dementia of Alzheimer's type and vascular dementia. Neurobiology of Aging 1992;13(supplement 1):S127. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zakharov VV. Lokshina AB. Stakhovskaia LV. Timerbaeva SL, Lagoda OV. The use of the combined drug vinpotropil at early stages of cerebrovascular insufficiency. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2007;107(9):76‐78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  19. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bereczki D, Fekete I. Vinpocetine for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1997, Issue 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bönöczk P, Gulyás B, Adam‐Vizi V, Nemes A, Kárpáti E, Kiss B, Kapás M, Szántay C, Koncz I, Zelles T, Vas A. Role of sodium channel inhibiton in neuroprotection: effect of vinpocetine. Brain Research Bulletin 2000;53:245‐254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Coleston DM, Hindmarch I. Possible emeory‐enhancing properties of vinpocetine. Drug Development and Research 1988;14:191‐193. [Google Scholar]
  23. DeNoble VJ, Repetti SJ, Gelpke LW, Wood LM, Keim KL. Vinpocetine: nootropic effects on scopolamine‐induced and hypoxia‐induced retrieval deficits of a step‐through passive avoidance response in rats. Pharmacology and Biochemistry of Behaviour 1986;24:1123‐1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. DeNoble VJ. Vinpocetine enhances retrieval of a step‐through passive avoidance response in rats. Pharmacology and Biochemistry of Behaviour 1987;26:183‐186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Erdo SL, Ning‐Sheng C, Wolff JR, Kiss B. Vinpocetine protects against excitotoxic cell death in primary cultures of rat cerebral cortex. European Journal of Pharmacology 1990;187:551‐553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Erzigkeit H. Manual zum SKT. Formen A‐E. Ebersburg: VLESS‐Verlagsgesellschaft, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  27. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini‐mental state: A practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12:189‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guy W. Clinical Global assessment Scale (CGI). In: Guy W editor(s). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville Md: US Dept of Health Education and Welfare, National Institute of Mental Health, 1976:218‐222. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hayakawa M. Effect of vinpocetine on red blood cell deformability in stroke patients. Arzneim‐Forsch/Drug Research 1992;42:425‐427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krieglstein J, Rischke R. Vinpocetine increases the neuroprotective effect of adenosine in vitro. European Journal of Pharmacology 1991;205:7‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuzuya F. Effects of vinpocetine on platelet aggregability and erythrocyte deformability. Geriatric Medicine 1982;20:151‐156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lauter H. Psychologie des 20 Jahrhunderts [Psychologie des 20 Jahrhunderts]. In: Peters UH editor(s). Demenzen. Vol. X, Psychiatrie, Kindler, 1980:637‐663. [Google Scholar]
  33. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Report of the NINCDS‐ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;4:939‐944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Molnár P, Erdo SL. Vinpocetine is as potent as phenytoin to block voltage‐gated Na channels in rat cortical neurons. European Journal of Pharmacology 1995;27:303‐306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration, 1997.
  36. Nagy Z, Vargha P, Kovacs L, Bonoczk P. Meta‐analysis of cavinton. Praxis 1998;7(S):1‐7. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rataud J, Debornot F, Mary V, Pratt J, Stutzmann JM. Comparative study of voltage‐sensitive sodium channel blockers in focal ischaemia and electric convulsions in rodens. Neuroscience Letters 1994;172:19‐23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Román CG, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Vascular dementia: Diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS ‐AIREN International Workshop. Neurology 1993;43:250‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Szakall Sz, Boros I, Balkay L, et al. Cerebral effects of a single dose of intravenous vinpocetine in chronic stroke patients: a PET study. Journal of Neuroimaging 1998;8:197‐204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Disease (ICD‐10). Geneva: WHO, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  41. Szatmari Sz, Whitehouse PJ. Vinpocetine for cognitive impairment and dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003119] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szatmári, S., & Whitehouse, P.
Affiliations
  • Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-20
Volume
2010
Issue
1
Pages
CD003119-CD003119
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1489084548
Cited by
151
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons @ Case Western Reserve University (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
vinpocetine, cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, mixed dementia, vinca alkaloids, cognitive decline, treatment efficacy, adverse effects, drug safety, global impression of change, older adults, randomized controlled trials, Vinca minor, attention and concentration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Humans, Vinca Alkaloids, Dementia, Vascular, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review