Cited by 490Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Statins for the prevention of dementia

Open access
McGuinness, Bernadette, Craig, David, Bullock, Roger, Passmore, Peter·2016·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001 and then updated in 2009. Vascular risk factors including high cholesterol levels increase the risk of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease and of vascular dementia. Some observational studies have suggested an association between statin use and lowered incidence of dementia. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of statins for the prevention of dementia in people at risk of dementia due to their age and to determine whether the efficacy and safety of statins for this purpose depends on cholesterol level, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype or cognitive level. Search methods We searched ALOIS (the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) Portal on 11 November 2015. Selection criteria We included double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials in which statins were administered for at least 12 months to people at risk of dementia. Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Main results We included two trials with 26,340 participants aged 40 to 82 years of whom 11,610 were aged 70 or older. All participants had a history of, or risk factors for, vascular disease. The studies used different statins (simvastatin and pravastatin). Mean follow-up was 3.2 years in one study and five years in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003160.pub3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 148 · Cited by 490

Authors
McGuinness, B., Craig, D., Bullock, R., & Passmore, P.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Craigavon Area Hospital (GB)
  • Victoria Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-04
Volume
2016
Issue
1
Pages
CD003160-CD003160
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1530780272
Cited by
490
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (13/89/22)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
statins, dementia prevention, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, simvastatin, pravastatin, cholesterol, APOE genotype, cognitive function, adverse events, statin safety, vascular risk factors, older adults, hypercholesterolemia, lipid-lowering therapy, cognitive decline, dementia incidence, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cognition, Dementia, Humans, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pravastatin, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review