Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia
Abstract
Background Memory problems are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific approaches designed to address everyday memory difficulties. Objectives The main aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving memory functioning for people in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. The two types of intervention were considered separately. Search strategy The CDCIG Specialized Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and many other databases, was searched on 9 April 2003. Selection criteria RCTs comparing cognitive rehabilitation or cognitive training interventions with comparison conditions, and reporting outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the family caregiver, were considered for inclusion. Data collection and analysis Six studies reporting cognitive training interventions were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to provide an indication of intervention effect sizes. Data from ordinal scales was treated as continuous, and a fixed effects model was applied in calculating weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. No studies were found that reported a fully individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach. Main results None of the six studies reporting cognitive training interventions demonstrated any statisti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acupuncture showed cognitive benefit in a rodent model of VaD, but a Cochrane review of acupuncture in human VaD was inconclusive.
“Acupuncture showed cognitive benefit in a rodent model of VaD,421 but a Cochrane review of acupuncture in human VaD was inconclusive,422”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 576
- Authors
- Clare, L., & Woods, B.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- University of Wales (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2003-10-20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- CD003260-CD003260
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113805305
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2013-06-05)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, early Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, memory impairment, dementia interventions, family caregivers, individualised rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Dementia, Vascular, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review