Cited by 576Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia

Clare, Linda, Woods, Bob·2003·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Memory problems are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific approaches designed to address everyday memory difficulties. Objectives The main aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving memory functioning for people in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. The two types of intervention were considered separately. Search strategy The CDCIG Specialized Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and many other databases, was searched on 9 April 2003. Selection criteria RCTs comparing cognitive rehabilitation or cognitive training interventions with comparison conditions, and reporting outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the family caregiver, were considered for inclusion. Data collection and analysis Six studies reporting cognitive training interventions were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to provide an indication of intervention effect sizes. Data from ordinal scales was treated as continuous, and a fixed effects model was applied in calculating weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. No studies were found that reported a fully individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach. Main results None of the six studies reporting cognitive training interventions demonstrated any statisti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 576

Authors
Clare, L., & Woods, B.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Wales (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2003-10-20
Issue
4
Pages
CD003260-CD003260
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113805305
Cited by
576
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, early Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, memory impairment, dementia interventions, family caregivers, individualised rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Dementia, Vascular, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review