Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Abstract
Background Evidence for the effectiveness of nutritional supplements containing protein and energy, which are often prescribed for older people, is limited. Furthermore malnutrition is more common in this age group and deterioration of nutritional status can occur during illness. It is important to establish whether supplementing the diet is an effective way of improving outcomes for older people at risk from malnutrition. Objectives This review examined the evidence from trials for improvement in nutritional status and clinical outcomes when extra protein and energy were provided, usually in the form of commercial 'sip-feeds'. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, CINAHL, BIOSIS, CAB abstracts. We also hand searched nutrition journals and reference lists and contacted 'sip-feed' manufacturers. Date of most recent search: March 2004. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials of oral protein and energy supplementation in older people with the exception of groups recovering from cancer treatment or in critical care. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently assessed trials prior to inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of trials were contacted for further information as necessary. Main results Forty-nine trials with 4790 randomised participants have been included in the review. Most included trials…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Subgroup analysis in meta-analyses from Milne et al. 2002 and 2005 showed a consistently statistically significant impact of ONS on mortality when supplementation was continued for 35 days or more compared to less than 35 days.
“Regarding the length of the intervention, subgroup analysis in the meta-analyses from Milne et al. from 2002 (117) and 2005 (118) showed a consistently statistically significant impact of ONS on mortality when supplementation was continued for 35 days or more compared to less than 35 days.”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
A systematic literature search found six high-quality SLRs that have assessed the efficacy of ONS versus usual care in older persons.
“A systematic literature search found six high-quality SLRs that have assessed the efficacy of ONS versus usual care in older persons (114-121).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 184 · Cited by 120
- Authors
- Milne, A. C., Potter, J., & Avenell, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- ORCID
- Avenell, Alison
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2005-01-24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD003288-CD003288
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4241358619
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2009-04-15)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Keywords
- protein supplementation, energy supplementation, malnutrition, older adults, nutritional status, weight gain, mortality, length of hospital stay, functional outcome, clinical outcomes, dietary supplements, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit analysis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Length of Stay, Nutrition Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review