The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose or miglitol, have the potential to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The true value of these agents, especially in relation to diabetes related mortality and morbidity, has never been investigated in a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors s in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, LILACS, databases of ongoing trials, reference lists of reviews on the topic of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and we contacted experts and manufacturers for additional trials. Date of most recent search: December 2003 (Current Contents) and April 2003 (other databases). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of at least 12 weeks duration comparing alpha-glucosidase inhibitor monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes with any other intervention and that included at least one of the following outcomes: mortality, morbidity, quality of life, glycemic control, lipids, insulin levels, body weight, adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers read all abstracts, assessed quality and extracted data independently. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or by the judgement of a third reviewer. A statistician checked all extracted data entrance in the database. We attempted to contact all authors for data clarification. MAIN RESULTS: We included 41 trials (8130 participants), 30 investigated acarbose, seven miglitol, one trial voglibose and three trials compared different alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Study duration was 24 weeks in most cases and only two studies lasted amply longer than one year. We found only few data on mortality, morbidity and quality of life. Acarbose had a clear effect on glycemic control compared to placebo: glycated haemoglobin -0.8% (95% confidence interval -0.9 to -0.7), fasting blood glucose -1.1 mmol/L (95% confidence interval -1.4 to -0.9), post-load blood glucose -2.3 mmol/L (95% confidence interval -2.7 to -1.9). The effect on glycated haemoglobin by acarbose was not dose-dependent. We found a decreasing effect on post-load insulin and no clinically relevant effects on lipids or body weight. Adverse effects were mostly of gastro-intestinal origin and dose dependent. Compared to sulphonylurea, acarbose decreased fasting and post-load insulin levels by -24.8 pmol/L (95% confidence interval -43.3 to -6.3) and -133.2 pmol/L (95% confidence interval -184.5 to -81.8) respectively and acarbose caused more adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It remains unclear whether alpha-glucosidase inhibitors influence mortality or morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Conversely, they have a significant effect on glycemic control and insulin levels, but no statistically significant effect on lipids and body weight. These effects are less sure when alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are used for a longer duration. Acarbose dosages higher than 50 mg TID offer no additional effect on glycated hemoglobin but more adverse effects instead. Compared to sulphonylurea, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors lower fasting and post-load insulin levels and have an inferior profile regarding glycemic control and adverse effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are less effective in lowering glycemia than metformin or the sulfonylureas, reducing A1C levels by 0.5-0.8 percentage points.
“They are less effective in lowering glycemia than metformin or the sulfonylureas, reducing A1C levels by 0.5–0.8 percentage points (29).”
From Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy (2009) · cites this paper as [29]
In clinical trials, 25-45% of participants have discontinued alpha-glucosidase inhibitor use as a result of increased gas production and gastrointestinal symptoms.
“In clinical trials, 25–45% of participants have discontinued α-glucosidase inhibitor use as a result of this side effect (29,60).”
From Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy (2009) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 96 · Cited by 335
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Braun, 1996, Efficacy of acarbose monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A double-blind study conducted in general practice, Endocrinology & Metabolism, 3, 275
- Campbell, 1998, Maintenance of glycaemic control with acarbose in diet treated Type 2 diabetic patients, Diabetic Medicine, 15, S29
- Ross, 1992, Acarbose significantly improves glucose control in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus subjects (NIDDM): results of the mult-centre Canadian trial, Diabetes, 41, 193A
- Drent, 1994, Miglitol as single oral hypoglycemic agent in type 2 diabetes, Diabetologia, 37, A211
- Gentile, 1997, Efficacy of acarbose in the control of diabetes mellitus associated with liver cirrhosis, Journal of Hepatology, 26, S101
- Gentile, 1997, The acarbose tretament of type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with liver cirrhosis, Diabetologia, 40, A306
- Hillebrand, 1987, Efficacy and tolerability of a 12-week treatment with acarbose (BAY g5421), miglitol (BAY m1099) and glibenclamid, Diabetes, 26, 134A
- Fölsch, 1990, Efficacy of glucosidase inhibitors compared to sulphonylureas in the treatment and metabolic control of diet treated Type II diabetic subjects: Two long-term comparative studies, Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism, 3, 63
- Hoffmann, 1992, Adjustment of metabolism and eating behaviour of type II diabetics. Results of a six-months treatment with glibenclamide, respectively with acarbose, Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 68, 970
- Holmes, 2001, Targeting postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: nateglinide vs acarbose, Diabetologia, 44, A215
- Sakamoto, 1990, An investigation into the efficacy of long term usage of Bay g 5421 (acarbose) for non-insulin dependent diabetes. A placebo controlled, double blind trial [japanese], Rinshou to Kenkyu, 67, 219
- Marena, 1993, Comparison of miglitol and glibenclamide in non insulin-dependent diabetic patients. [Italian], Giornale Italiano di Diabetologia, 13, 383
- Marena, 1993, Miglitol vs Glibenclamide in non-insulin dependent diabete mellitus, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 23, A43
- Mauersberger, 2001, Wirkung von endogenem Insulin sowie Acarbose oder Glibenclamide in der Therapie der Hypertonie bei Typ-2-Diabetikern, CF-Journal, 26
- Rybka, 1999, European comparative study of 2 alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, miglitol and acarbose, Diabetes, 48, 101
- Santeusanio, 1993, Efficacy and safety of two different dosages of acarbose in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients treated by diet alone, Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism - Clinical & Experimental, 6, 147
- Fölsch, 1990, Efficacy of glucosidase inhibitors compared to sulphonylureas in the treatment and metabolic control of diet treated Type II diabetic subjects: Two long-term comparative studies, Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism, 3, 63
- Spengler M Hänsel G Boehme K Efficacy of 6 months monotherapy with glucosidase inhibitor acarbose versus sulphonylurea glibenclamid on metabolic control of dietary treated type II diabetics European Journal of Clinical Investigation 1989 A71 498
- Spengler, 1990, Acarbose and glibenclamide in type II diabetes, Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 65, 606
- Zheng, 1995, Clinical observation on glucobay treatment for NIDDM. [Chinese], Chinese Journal of Endocrinology, 11, 163
- Fölsch, 1990, Efficacy of glucosidase inhibitors compared to sulphonylureas in the treatment and metabolic control of diet treated Type II diabetic subjects: Two long-term comparative studies, Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism, 3, 63
- Hanefeld, 2004, Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analyses of seven long-term studies, European Heart Journal, 25, 10, 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00468-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Lebovitz, 1998, Alpha-Glucosidase inhibitors as agents in the treatment of diabetes, Diabetes Reviews, 6, 132
- Navarro, Oral combination therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (Protocol for a Cochrane Review), The Cochrane Library
- Rutten, 2000, Dutch College of General Practitioners.Guidelines on Type 2 Diabetes, Huisarts en Wetenschap, 42, 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Van de Laar, F. A., Lucassen, P. L., Akkermans, R. P., Van de Lisdonk, E. H., Rutten, G. E., & Van Weel, C.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Department of General Practice, 117 HAG; P.O. Box 9101 Nijmegen Netherlands 6500 HB
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Centre ; Department of General Practice and Family Medicine; 117 Hag P.O. Box 9101 Nijmegen Netherlands 6500 HB
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; Department of General Practice; (117 HAG) PO Box 9101 Nijmegen Netherlands 6500 HB
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-20
- Volume
- 2009
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD003639-CD003639
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC8406605
- OpenAlex
- W1867945356
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, acarbose, miglitol, voglibose, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, insulin, serum lipids, body weight, gastrointestinal adverse effects, mortality, morbidity, quality of life, monotherapy, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Enzyme Inhibitors, Glucosamine, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Inositol, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, 1-Deoxynojirimycin, Acarbose, Imino Pyranoses, Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review