Cited by 694Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryNausea and vomiting managementDietary Effects on Health

Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications

Brady, Marian C, Kinn, Sue, Stuart, Pauline, Ness, Valerie·2003·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Fasting before general anaesthesia aims to reduce the volume and acidity of stomach contents during surgery, thus reducing the risk of regurgitation/aspiration. Recent guidelines have recommended a shift in fasting policy from the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' approach to more relaxed policies which permit a period of restricted fluid intake up to a few hours before surgery. The evidence underpinning these guidelines however, was scattered across a range of journals, in a variety of languages, used a variety of outcome measures and methodologies to evaluate fasting regimens that differed in duration and the type and volume of intake permitted during a restricted fasting period. Practice has been slow to change. Objectives To systematically review the effect of different preoperative fasting regimens (duration, type and volume of permitted intake) on perioperative complications and patient wellbeing (including aspiration, regurgitation and related morbidity, thirst, hunger, pain, nausea, vomiting, anxiety) in different adult populations. Search strategy Electronic databases, conference proceedings and reference lists from relevant articles were searched for studies of preoperative fasting in August 2003 and experts in the area were consulted. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials which compared the effect on postoperative complications of different preoperative fasting regimens on adults were included. Data collection and analysis Details of the el…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd004423

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66 · Cited by 694

Authors
Brady, M. C., Kinn, S., Stuart, P., & Ness, V.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • Department for International Development (GB)
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-20
Issue
4
Pages
CD004423-CD004423
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1816870656
Cited by
694
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 40
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
preoperative fasting, general anesthesia, perioperative complications, aspiration, regurgitation, gastric volume, gastric pH, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient well-being, anaesthesia guidelines, adults, patient safety, hunger and thirst, anxiety, pain, postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, postoperative hospital stay
MeSH terms
Adult, Anesthesia, General, Drinking, Fasting, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review