Cited by 271Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and care

Psychological interventions for multiple sclerosis.

Open access
Thomas, Peter W, Thomas, Sarah, Hillier, Charles, Galvin, Kate, Baker, Roger·2006·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The unpredictable, variable nature of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and the possibility of increasing disability, means that a diagnosis can have substantial psychological consequences. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions for people with MS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched 19 databases up to December 2004; Cochrane MS Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and 14 others. We searched reference lists of articles, wrote to corresponding authors of the 13 papers identified by June 2004, and searched for trials in progress using 3 research registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of interventions described as wholly or mostly based on psychological theory and practice, in people with MS. Primary outcome measures were disease specific and general quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, psychological functioning, disability, and cognitive outcomes. Secondary outcome measures were number of relapses, pain, fatigue, health care utilisation, changes in medication, and adherence to other therapies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pertinent studies were identified from abstracts by one author. Full papers were independently compared to selection criteria by four authors. Key details were extracted from relevant papers using a standard format, and studies scored on three dimensions of quality. The review is organised into four mini-reviews (MR) dependent on the intervention's target population; people with cognitive impairments (MR1), people with moderate to severe disability (MR2), people with MS (no other criteria) (MR3), and people with depression (MR4). MAIN RESULTS: Overall 16 studies were identified and included. MR1: three trials (n=145). Some evidence of effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive outcomes, although this was difficult to interpret because of the large number of outcome measures used. MR2: three trials (n=80). One small trial suggesting psychotherapy may help with depression. MR3: seven studies (n=688). Some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy may help people adjust to, and cope with, having MS (three trials). The other trials were diverse in nature and some difficult to interpret because of multiple outcome measures. MR4: three trials (n=93). Two small studies of cognitive behavioural therapy showed significant improvements in depression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of psychological interventions identified indicates the many ways in which they can potentially help people with MS. No definite conclusions can be made from this review. However there is reasonable evidence that cognitive behavioural approaches are beneficial in the treatment of depression, and in helping people adjust to, and cope with, having MS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd004431.pub2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 107 · Cited by 271

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Rigby, S. Coping with MS. Liverpool: University of Liverpool, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes RH, Busse EW, Dinken H. The alleviation of emotional problems in multiple sclerosis by group therapy. Group Psychotherapy 1954;6:193‐201. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bedford A, Foulds G. Delusions‐Symptoms‐States‐Inventory. Windsor: NFER‐Nelson, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke M, Oxman AD. Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook Version 4.1.1 (updated December 2000); Section 6. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software, 2001, issue 1.
  5. Heaton RK, Nelson LM, Thompson DS, Burks JS, Franklin GM. Neuropsychological findings in relapse‐remitting multiple sclerosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1985;53:103‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McIvor GP, Riklan M, Reznikoff M. Depression in multiple sclerosis as a function of length and severity of illness, age, remissions and perceived social support. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1984;40:1028‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Profile of Mood States Manual. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mohr DC, Boudewyn AC, Goodkin DE, Bostrom A, Epstein L. Comparative outcomes for individual cognitive‐behavior therapy, supportive‐expressive group psychotherapy, and sertraline for the treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2001;69(6):942‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosenberg M. Self‐esteem scale. In: Rosenberg M editor(s). Society and the adolescent self‐image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1965. [Google Scholar]

Authors
Thomas, P. W., Thomas, S., Hillier, C., Galvin, K., & Baker, R.
Affiliations
  • Poole Hospital (GB)
  • Bournemouth University; School of Health and Social Care; Royal London House, Christchurch Road Bournemouth Dorset UK BH1 3LT
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-25
Volume
2010
Issue
1
Pages
CD004431-CD004431
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1572362144
Cited by
271
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 26
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, psychological intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, cognitive rehabilitation, psychotherapy, quality of life, disability, coping, cognitive impairment, relapse, fatigue, pain, health care utilization, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Emotions, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review