Psychological interventions for multiple sclerosis.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The unpredictable, variable nature of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and the possibility of increasing disability, means that a diagnosis can have substantial psychological consequences. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions for people with MS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched 19 databases up to December 2004; Cochrane MS Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and 14 others. We searched reference lists of articles, wrote to corresponding authors of the 13 papers identified by June 2004, and searched for trials in progress using 3 research registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of interventions described as wholly or mostly based on psychological theory and practice, in people with MS. Primary outcome measures were disease specific and general quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, psychological functioning, disability, and cognitive outcomes. Secondary outcome measures were number of relapses, pain, fatigue, health care utilisation, changes in medication, and adherence to other therapies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pertinent studies were identified from abstracts by one author. Full papers were independently compared to selection criteria by four authors. Key details were extracted from relevant papers using a standard format, and studies scored on three dimensions of quality. The review is organised into four mini-reviews (MR) dependent on the intervention's target population; people with cognitive impairments (MR1), people with moderate to severe disability (MR2), people with MS (no other criteria) (MR3), and people with depression (MR4). MAIN RESULTS: Overall 16 studies were identified and included. MR1: three trials (n=145). Some evidence of effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive outcomes, although this was difficult to interpret because of the large number of outcome measures used. MR2: three trials (n=80). One small trial suggesting psychotherapy may help with depression. MR3: seven studies (n=688). Some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy may help people adjust to, and cope with, having MS (three trials). The other trials were diverse in nature and some difficult to interpret because of multiple outcome measures. MR4: three trials (n=93). Two small studies of cognitive behavioural therapy showed significant improvements in depression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of psychological interventions identified indicates the many ways in which they can potentially help people with MS. No definite conclusions can be made from this review. However there is reasonable evidence that cognitive behavioural approaches are beneficial in the treatment of depression, and in helping people adjust to, and cope with, having MS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy has a moderate effect on depression in MS.
“A Cochrane review [17] and a recent meta-analysis [18] identified that Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) had a moderate effect on depression.”
From The efficacy of a Mindfulness Based Intervention for depressive symptoms in patients with Multiple Sclerosis and their caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial. (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
The Discussion (Mini-review 4; page unavailable) reports that two small CBT trials in people with MS found improvements in depression, and that a fixed-effects meta-analysis found an improvement. It does not characterize the effect as moderate; it also notes substantial heterogeneity and that a random-effects reanalysis was not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is reasonable evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy is beneficial in the treatment of depression and in helping people adjust to, and cope with, having multiple sclerosis.
“However, there is reasonable evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is beneficial in the treatment of depression, and in helping people adjust to, and cope with, having MS (2).”
From Cognitive behavioural therapy in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy (2012) · cites this paper as [2]
The scope for using psychological interventions in multiple sclerosis is broad, while the evidence-base is still relatively small.
“In a Cochrane review from 2007 it was concluded that the scope for using psychological interventions in MS is broad, while the evidence-base is still relatively small (2).”
From Cognitive behavioural therapy in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy (2012) · cites this paper as [2]
Cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to have a moderate effect on depression in multiple sclerosis.
“In particular, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to have a moderate effect on depression (Thomas et al., 2006; Fiest et al., 2016).”
From The effectiveness of a body-affective mindfulness intervention for multiple sclerosis patients with depressive symptoms: A randomized controlled clinical trial (2017) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 107 · Cited by 271
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Rigby, S. Coping with MS. Liverpool: University of Liverpool, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Barnes RH, Busse EW, Dinken H. The alleviation of emotional problems in multiple sclerosis by group therapy. Group Psychotherapy 1954;6:193‐201. [Google Scholar]
- Bedford A, Foulds G. Delusions‐Symptoms‐States‐Inventory. Windsor: NFER‐Nelson, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Clarke M, Oxman AD. Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook Version 4.1.1 (updated December 2000); Section 6. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software, 2001, issue 1.
- Heaton RK, Nelson LM, Thompson DS, Burks JS, Franklin GM. Neuropsychological findings in relapse‐remitting multiple sclerosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1985;53:103‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIvor GP, Riklan M, Reznikoff M. Depression in multiple sclerosis as a function of length and severity of illness, age, remissions and perceived social support. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1984;40:1028‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Profile of Mood States Manual. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Mohr DC, Boudewyn AC, Goodkin DE, Bostrom A, Epstein L. Comparative outcomes for individual cognitive‐behavior therapy, supportive‐expressive group psychotherapy, and sertraline for the treatment of depression in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2001;69(6):942‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenberg M. Self‐esteem scale. In: Rosenberg M editor(s). Society and the adolescent self‐image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Thomas, P. W., Thomas, S., Hillier, C., Galvin, K., & Baker, R.
- Affiliations
- Poole Hospital (GB)
- Bournemouth University; School of Health and Social Care; Royal London House, Christchurch Road Bournemouth Dorset UK BH1 3LT
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-25
- Volume
- 2010
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD004431-CD004431
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC8406851
- OpenAlex
- W1572362144
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, psychological intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, cognitive rehabilitation, psychotherapy, quality of life, disability, coping, cognitive impairment, relapse, fatigue, pain, health care utilization, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Emotions, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review