Family-centred care for children in hospital
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family-centred care (FCC) is a widely used model in paediatrics, and is felt instinctively to be the best way to provide care to children in hospital. However, its effectiveness has not been measured. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review was to assess the effects of family-centred models of care for hospitalised children when compared to standard or professionally-centred models of care, on child, family and health service outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched: MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004); CINAHL (1982 to February 2004); PsycINFO (1972 to February 2004); ERIC (1982 to February 2004); Sociological Abstracts (1963 to February 2004); Social Work Abstracts (1977 to February 2004); and AMI (Australasian Medical Index) (1966 to February 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials including cluster randomised trials and controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and controlled before and after studies (CBAs), in which family-centred care models are compared with professionally-centred models of care for hospitalised children (aged up to 12 years). Studies also had to meet criteria for family-centredness and methodological quality. In order to assess studies for the degree of family-centredness, this review utilised a modified rating scale based on a validated instrument. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors undertook the searches, and three authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met inclusion criteria, and hence no analysis could be undertaken. Five studies came close to inclusion. Three of these studies were excluded primarily because of inadequate or unclear blinding of outcome assessment, while for one study the age group was outside the parameters of this review. One study met most criteria, but the children were aged up to 18 years. We contacted the study authors who kindly provided a subset analysis, but on further examination the study also proved to have inadequate blinding procedures and so was not included. It was not possible to undertake any subset analysis of populations. Of the other studies identified through the search, 13 met some of the inclusion criteria but were reports of qualitative research and are reviewed elsewhere. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the dearth of high quality quantitative research about family-centred care. A much more stringent examination of the use of family-centred care as a model for care delivery to children and families in health services is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research is hampered by a lack of true validated measures and outcome measures for FCC.
“Research is hampered by a lack of true validated measures and outcome measures for FCC.”
From Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2012) · cites this paper as [84]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 126 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Shields, L., Pratt, J., Davis, L., & Hunter, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Hull (GB)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2007-01-24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD004811-CD004811
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1809342977
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2012-10-17)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- family-centered care, hospitalized children, pediatric hospital care, models of care, child outcomes, health service outcomes, family involvement in care decisions
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Hospitalized, Comprehensive Health Care, Family, Humans, Patient-Centered Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review