Cited by 198Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CarePsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Psychotherapy for depression among incurable cancer patients

Open access
Akechi, Tatsuo, Okuyama, Toru, Onishi, Joji, Morita, Tatsuya, Furukawa, Toshi A·2008·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most common psychiatric diagnosis among cancer patients is depression; this diagnosis is even more common among patients with advanced cancer. Psychotherapy is a patient-preferred and promising strategy for treating depression among cancer patients. Several systematic reviews have investigated the effectiveness of psychological treatment for depression among cancer patients. However, the findings are conflicting, and no review has focused on depression among patients with incurable cancer. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of psychotherapy for treating depression among patients with advanced cancer by conducting a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases in September 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant RCTs comparing any kind of psychotherapy with conventional treatment for adult patients with advanced cancer were eligible for inclusion. Two independent review authors identified relevant studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the original reports using standardized data extraction forms. Two independent review authors also assessed the methodological quality of the selected studies according to the recommendations of a previous systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients that utilized ten internal validity indicators. The primary outcome was the standardized mean difference (SMD) of change between the baseline and immediate post-treatment scores. MAIN RESULTS: We identified a total of ten RCTs (total of 780 participants); data from six studies were used for meta-analyses (292 patients in the psychotherapy arm and 225 patients in the control arm). Among these six studies, four studies used supportive psychotherapy, one adopted cognitive behavioural therapy, and one adopted problem-solving therapy. When compared with treatment as usual, psychotherapy was associated with a significant decrease in depression score (SMD = -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.08 to -0.80). None of the studies focused on patients with clinically diagnosed depression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs of moderate quality suggest that psychotherapy is useful for treating depressive states in advanced cancer patients. However, no evidence supports the effectiveness of psychotherapy for patients with clinically diagnosed depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd005537.pub2This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of enduring effects of conventional psycho- or pharmacotherapy is limited or ambiguous.

    “Evidence of enduring effects of conventional psycho-or pharmacotherapy is limited or ambiguous (Akechi et al., 2008;Ostuzzi et al., 2018).”

    From Psychedelics for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and existential distress in patients with a terminal illness: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Akechi et al., 2008

    The Actual method section says the meta-analysis used change from baseline to immediate post-treatment scores, so its findings do not establish enduring effects of psychotherapy. The review concerns patients with advanced cancer; it does not assess enduring effects of pharmacotherapy or support the claim across other populations. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 198

Authors
Akechi, T., Okuyama, T., Onishi, J., Morita, T., & Furukawa, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya City University (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-16
Issue
2
Pages
CD005537-CD005537
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1955762873
Cited by
198
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Educational Testing Service
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
psychotherapy, depression, advanced cancer, incurable cancer, supportive therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, psychological intervention, palliative care, usual care
MeSH terms
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review