Psychotherapy for depression among incurable cancer patients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The most common psychiatric diagnosis among cancer patients is depression; this diagnosis is even more common among patients with advanced cancer. Psychotherapy is a patient-preferred and promising strategy for treating depression among cancer patients. Several systematic reviews have investigated the effectiveness of psychological treatment for depression among cancer patients. However, the findings are conflicting, and no review has focused on depression among patients with incurable cancer. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of psychotherapy for treating depression among patients with advanced cancer by conducting a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases in September 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant RCTs comparing any kind of psychotherapy with conventional treatment for adult patients with advanced cancer were eligible for inclusion. Two independent review authors identified relevant studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the original reports using standardized data extraction forms. Two independent review authors also assessed the methodological quality of the selected studies according to the recommendations of a previous systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients that utilized ten internal validity indicators. The primary outcome was the standardized mean difference (SMD) of change between the baseline and immediate post-treatment scores. MAIN RESULTS: We identified a total of ten RCTs (total of 780 participants); data from six studies were used for meta-analyses (292 patients in the psychotherapy arm and 225 patients in the control arm). Among these six studies, four studies used supportive psychotherapy, one adopted cognitive behavioural therapy, and one adopted problem-solving therapy. When compared with treatment as usual, psychotherapy was associated with a significant decrease in depression score (SMD = -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.08 to -0.80). None of the studies focused on patients with clinically diagnosed depression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs of moderate quality suggest that psychotherapy is useful for treating depressive states in advanced cancer patients. However, no evidence supports the effectiveness of psychotherapy for patients with clinically diagnosed depression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence of enduring effects of conventional psycho- or pharmacotherapy is limited or ambiguous.
“Evidence of enduring effects of conventional psycho-or pharmacotherapy is limited or ambiguous (Akechi et al., 2008;Ostuzzi et al., 2018).”
From Psychedelics for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and existential distress in patients with a terminal illness: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Akechi et al., 2008
The Actual method section says the meta-analysis used change from baseline to immediate post-treatment scores, so its findings do not establish enduring effects of psychotherapy. The review concerns patients with advanced cancer; it does not assess enduring effects of pharmacotherapy or support the claim across other populations. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 198
- Authors
- Akechi, T., Okuyama, T., Onishi, J., Morita, T., & Furukawa, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya City University (JP)
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD005537-CD005537
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6464138
- OpenAlex
- W1955762873
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Educational Testing Service
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- psychotherapy, depression, advanced cancer, incurable cancer, supportive therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, psychological intervention, palliative care, usual care
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review