Cited by 265Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesAcute Kidney Injury Research

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease

Open access
Strippoli, Giovanni FM, Bonifati, Carmen, Craig, Maria E, Navaneethan, Sankar D, Craig, Jonathan C·2006·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRA) are considered to be equally effective for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but renal and not mortality outcomes have usually been considered. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms ACEi and AIIRA in patients with DKD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (1980 to December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library issue 4 2005) and contacted known investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies comparing ACEi or AIIRA with placebo or each other in patients with DKD were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was explored using the Cochran Q statistic and the I(2) test, subgroup analyses and random effects metaregression. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty studies (13,215 patients) were identified. Thirty eight compared ACEi with placebo, five compared AIIRA with placebo and seven compared ACEi and AIIRA directly. There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality for ACEi versus placebo (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and AIIRA versus placebo (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17). A subgroup analysis of studies using full-dose ACEi versus studies using half or less than half the maximum tolerable dose of ACEi showed a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality with the use of full-dose ACEi (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). Baseline mortality rates were similar in the ACEi and AIIRA studies. The effects of ACEi and AIIRA on renal outcomes (ESKD, doubling of creatinine, prevention of progression of micro- to macroalbuminuria, remission of micro- to normoalbuminuria) were similarly beneficial. Reliable estimates of effect of ACEi versus AIIRA could not be obtained from the three studies in which they were compared directly because of their small sample size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although the survival benefits of ACEi are known for patients with DKD, the relative effects on survival of ACEi with AIIRA are unknown due to the lack of adequate direct comparison studies. In placebo controlled studies, only ACEi (at the maximum tolerable dose, but not lower so-called renal doses) were found to significantly reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. Renal and toxicity profiles of these two classes of agents were not significantly different.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006257

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACEi or ARB treatment in patients with diabetes and CKD is associated with a reduction in progression of CKD with regard to the development of severely increased albuminuria (RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.29-0.69 for ACEi and RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35-0.57 for ARB).

    “the use of ACEi or ARB treatment in patients with diabetes and CKD was associated with a reduction in the progression of CKD with regard to the development of severely increased albuminuria (relative risk [RR]: 0.45; 95% con fi dence interval [CI]: 0.29 -0.69 and RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35 -0.57, respectively)”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The ACEi versus placebo/no treatment section reports reduced progression from micro- to macroalbuminuria with the stated RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.29–0.69). The AIIRA versus placebo/no treatment section also reports a reduction, but gives RR 0.49 (95% CI 0.32–0.75), not the ARB estimate quoted in the claim. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ACEi or ARB treatment in patients with diabetes and CKD is associated with a reduction in doubling of serum creatinine (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-1.00 for ACEi and RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98 for ARB).

    “or doubling of serum creatinine (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47 -1.00 and RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72 -0.98, respectively)”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The ACEi versus placebo/no treatment section reports the claimed RR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.47–1.00) for doubling of serum creatinine. For ARBs (called AIIRA in the review), the reported pooled estimate is RR 0.79 (95% CI 0.67–0.93), not the claimed 0.84 (0.72–0.98). Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 265

Authors
Strippoli, G. F., Bonifati, C., Craig, M. E., Navaneethan, S. D., & Craig, J. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10-18
Issue
4
Pages
CD006257-CD006257
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2168014540
Cited by
265
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, diabetic nephropathy, disease progression, all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease, albuminuria, renal protection, renin-angiotensin system blockade, adverse events, nephrotoxicity, hypotension, hyperkalemia
MeSH terms
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Cause of Death, Diabetic Nephropathies, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Disease Progression, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review