Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRA) are considered to be equally effective for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but renal and not mortality outcomes have usually been considered. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms ACEi and AIIRA in patients with DKD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (1980 to December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library issue 4 2005) and contacted known investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies comparing ACEi or AIIRA with placebo or each other in patients with DKD were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was explored using the Cochran Q statistic and the I(2) test, subgroup analyses and random effects metaregression. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty studies (13,215 patients) were identified. Thirty eight compared ACEi with placebo, five compared AIIRA with placebo and seven compared ACEi and AIIRA directly. There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality for ACEi versus placebo (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and AIIRA versus placebo (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17). A subgroup analysis of studies using full-dose ACEi versus studies using half or less than half the maximum tolerable dose of ACEi showed a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality with the use of full-dose ACEi (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). Baseline mortality rates were similar in the ACEi and AIIRA studies. The effects of ACEi and AIIRA on renal outcomes (ESKD, doubling of creatinine, prevention of progression of micro- to macroalbuminuria, remission of micro- to normoalbuminuria) were similarly beneficial. Reliable estimates of effect of ACEi versus AIIRA could not be obtained from the three studies in which they were compared directly because of their small sample size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although the survival benefits of ACEi are known for patients with DKD, the relative effects on survival of ACEi with AIIRA are unknown due to the lack of adequate direct comparison studies. In placebo controlled studies, only ACEi (at the maximum tolerable dose, but not lower so-called renal doses) were found to significantly reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. Renal and toxicity profiles of these two classes of agents were not significantly different.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ACEi or ARB treatment in patients with diabetes and CKD is associated with a reduction in progression of CKD with regard to the development of severely increased albuminuria (RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.29-0.69 for ACEi and RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35-0.57 for ARB).
“the use of ACEi or ARB treatment in patients with diabetes and CKD was associated with a reduction in the progression of CKD with regard to the development of severely increased albuminuria (relative risk [RR]: 0.45; 95% con fi dence interval [CI]: 0.29 -0.69 and RR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35 -0.57, respectively)”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
The ACEi versus placebo/no treatment section reports reduced progression from micro- to macroalbuminuria with the stated RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.29–0.69). The AIIRA versus placebo/no treatment section also reports a reduction, but gives RR 0.49 (95% CI 0.32–0.75), not the ARB estimate quoted in the claim. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredACEi or ARB treatment in patients with diabetes and CKD is associated with a reduction in doubling of serum creatinine (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-1.00 for ACEi and RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98 for ARB).
“or doubling of serum creatinine (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47 -1.00 and RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72 -0.98, respectively)”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
The ACEi versus placebo/no treatment section reports the claimed RR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.47–1.00) for doubling of serum creatinine. For ARBs (called AIIRA in the review), the reported pooled estimate is RR 0.79 (95% CI 0.67–0.93), not the claimed 0.84 (0.72–0.98). Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 265
- Authors
- Strippoli, G. F., Bonifati, C., Craig, M. E., Navaneethan, S. D., & Craig, J. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- CD006257-CD006257
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6956646
- OpenAlex
- W2168014540
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2024-04-29)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, diabetic nephropathy, disease progression, all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease, albuminuria, renal protection, renin-angiotensin system blockade, adverse events, nephrotoxicity, hypotension, hyperkalemia
- MeSH terms
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Cause of Death, Diabetic Nephropathies, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Disease Progression, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review