Psychostimulants for depression
Abstract
Background Depression is common, disabling, costly and under-treated. There are problems in the current first-line drug treatment, antidepressants, for moderate or severe depression. There is a body of research that has evaluated the effect of psychostimulants (PS) in the treatment of depression. This has not been reviewed systematically. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of PS in the treatment of depression and to assess adverse events associated with PS. Search strategy Databases CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References were searched on 21/6/2006. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, AMED, CINAHL, Dissertation Abstracts and the National Health Service Research Register were searched. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of PS were included. The trial population comprised adults of either sex with a diagnosis of depression. Data collection and analysis Two review authors extracted the data independently and assessed trial quality. Meta-analysis was considered for trials with comparable key characteristics. The primary outcome was depression symptoms, based on a continuous outcome, using the standardised mean difference (SMD), or a dichotomous measure of clinical response, using odds ratios (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results Twenty-four RCTs were identified. The overall quality of the trials was low. Five drugs were evaluated; dexamphetamine, methylphenidate, methyl…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 2008 meta-analysis of 3 short-term trials reported statistically significant improvements favoring monotherapy with psychostimulants compared with placebo for depressive symptoms.
“Although one meta-analysis published in 2008 based on 3 short-term trials reported statistically significant improvements favoring monotherapy with psychostimulants compared with placebo for depressive symptoms (232), a systematic review of augmentation therapy for MDD published in 2009 based on MPH (2 studies) and modafinil (2 studies) reported that neither augmentation strategy was clinically”
In 2 meta-analyses, mixed results were reported with respect to the efficacy of psychostimulants or eugorics (modafinil) as augmentation therapy in MDD.
“However, in 2 meta-analyses (Candy et al., 2008;Fleurence et al., 2009), mixed results were reported with respect to the efficacy of psychostimulants or eugorics (modafinil) as augmentation therapy in MDD.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 132 · Cited by 156
- Authors
- Candy, B., Jones, L., Williams, R., Tookman, A., & King, M.
- Affiliations
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD006722-CD006722
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W1936731931
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- psychostimulants, depression, antidepressant monotherapy, modafinil, d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, methamphetamine, pemoline, depressive symptoms, fatigue, adverse events, drug tolerance, drug addiction, adjunctive therapy, placebo comparison, treatment effectiveness, antidepressant resistance, treatment acceptability, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review