Cited by 156Treatment of Major DepressionAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychostimulants for depression

Candy, Bridget, Jones, Louise, Williams, Rachael, Tookman, Adrian, King, Michael·2008·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Depression is common, disabling, costly and under-treated. There are problems in the current first-line drug treatment, antidepressants, for moderate or severe depression. There is a body of research that has evaluated the effect of psychostimulants (PS) in the treatment of depression. This has not been reviewed systematically. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of PS in the treatment of depression and to assess adverse events associated with PS. Search strategy Databases CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References were searched on 21/6/2006. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, AMED, CINAHL, Dissertation Abstracts and the National Health Service Research Register were searched. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of PS were included. The trial population comprised adults of either sex with a diagnosis of depression. Data collection and analysis Two review authors extracted the data independently and assessed trial quality. Meta-analysis was considered for trials with comparable key characteristics. The primary outcome was depression symptoms, based on a continuous outcome, using the standardised mean difference (SMD), or a dichotomous measure of clinical response, using odds ratios (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results Twenty-four RCTs were identified. The overall quality of the trials was low. Five drugs were evaluated; dexamphetamine, methylphenidate, methyl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006722.pub2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 132 · Cited by 156

Authors
Candy, B., Jones, L., Williams, R., Tookman, A., & King, M.
Affiliations
The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-23
Issue
2
Pages
CD006722-CD006722
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1936731931
Cited by
156
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychostimulants, depression, antidepressant monotherapy, modafinil, d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, methamphetamine, pemoline, depressive symptoms, fatigue, adverse events, drug tolerance, drug addiction, adjunctive therapy, placebo comparison, treatment effectiveness, antidepressant resistance, treatment acceptability, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review