Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Abstract
BackgroundPsychological treatments are designed to treat pain, distress and disability, and are in common practice. No comprehensive systematic review has been published since 1999.Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies on pain, disability, and mood.Search strategyRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological therapy were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psychlit and CENTRAL from the beginning of each abstracting service until January 2008. A further search was undertaken from January 2008 to August 2008. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved papers and from discussion with investigators.Selection criteriaFull publications of RCTs of psychological treatments compared with an active treatment, waiting list or treatment as usual. Studies were excluded if the pain was primarily headache, or was associated with a malignant disease. Studies were also excluded if the number of patients in any treatment arm was less than 10.Data collection and analysisFifty-two studies were examined with a quality rating scale specifically designed for use with these studies. Data were extracted from 40 studies (4781 participants) by two authors. Two main classes of treatment (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Behaviour Therapy (BT)), were compared with two control conditions (Treatment as Usual (TAU) and Active control (AC)), at two assessment points (immediately following treatment and six months following trea…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two recent meta-analyses found only small-to-moderate benefits of psychological interventions for chronic pain.
“2 recent meta-analyses indicate small to moderate benefits only.”
Consistent with recent Cochrane reviews of psychological interventions, psychology alone may have limited effects on important aspects of the pain experience.
“Second, consistent with the recent Cochrane reviews of psychological interventions,13,57 psychology alone may have limited effects on important aspects of the pain experience.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 9 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Eccleston, C., Morley, S., & Williams, A. C. D. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2008-10-08
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232256276
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- chronic pain, psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavior therapy, disability, mood, pain management, treatment effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review