CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123Bone fractures and treatmentsElectromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsElectromagnetic Effects on Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electromagnetic field stimulation for treating delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures in adults

Open access
Griffin, Xavier L, Costa, Matthew L, Parsons, Nick, Smith, Nick·2011·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008471.pub2PMC PMC12754039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed union and non-union of fractures are a considerable cause of morbidity to patients. Laboratory studies have shown that electromagnetic fields can stimulate the formation of new bone, indicating a potential role for electromagnetic stimulation in the treatment of fractures that have failed to heal. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of electromagnetic stimulation for treating delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (May 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (in The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2010) and EMBASE (1980 to 2010 Week 20), trial registers and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating electromagnetic field stimulation for the treatment of delayed union or non-union of long bones in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Treatment effects were assessed using risk ratios and, where appropriate, data were pooled using a random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies, involving 125 participants, were included. Three studies evaluated the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields and one study, capacitive coupled electric fields. Participants with delayed union and non-union of the long bones were included, but most data related to non-union of the tibia. Although all studies were blinded randomised placebo-controlled trials, each study had limitations.The primary measure of the clinical effectiveness of electromagnetic field stimulation was the proportion of participants whose fractures had united at a fixed time point. The overall pooled effect size was small and not statistically significant (risk ratio 1.96; 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 4.48; 4 trials). There was substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity in this pooled analysis (I(2) = 58%). A sensitivity analysis conducted to determine the effect of multiple follow-up time-points on the heterogeneity amongst the studies showed that the effect size remained non-significant at 24 weeks (risk ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 3.54; 3 trials), with similar heterogeneity (I(2) = 57%).There was no reduction in pain found in two trials. No study reported functional outcome measures. One trial reported two minor complications resulting from treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Though the available evidence suggests that electromagnetic field stimulation may offer some benefit in the treatment of delayed union and non-union of long bone fractures, it is inconclusive and insufficient to inform current practice. More definitive conclusions on treatment effect await further well-conducted randomised controlled trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd008471.pub2

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Parnell, 1991, The effect of electrical stimulation in the treatment of non-union of the tibia [Abstract], Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 73 Suppl 2, 178
  2. Lefebvre C Manheimer E Glanville J Chapter 6.4.11: Search Filters In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org
  3. Sharrard, 1992, Pulsed electromagnetic fields [letter; comment], Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 74, 630, 10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624534 · DOI
  4. Yasuda, 1953, Fundamental aspects of fracture treatment, Journal of the Kyoto Medical Society, 4, 395

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–123 of 123

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Griffin, X. L., Costa, M. L., Parsons, N., & Smith, N.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-13
Volume
2011
Issue
4
Pages
CD008471-CD008471
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
DOI
10.1002/14651858.cd008471.pub2
PMC
PMC12754039
OpenAlex
W2110949712
Cited by
123
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2006-08-001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Electromagnetic Effects on Materials
Keywords
electromagnetic field stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic fields, delayed union, nonunion, long bone fractures, tibial fractures, fracture healing, bone formation, pain, treatment complications, adults, functional outcome, treatment effect heterogeneity, risk of bias, sensitivity analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Arm Injuries, Fractures, Ununited, Humans, Leg Injuries, Tibial Fractures, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Fracture Healing, Magnetic Field Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review