Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents
Abstract
Background Adult smoking usually has its roots in adolescence. If individuals do not take up smoking during this period it is unlikely that they ever will. Further, once smoking becomes established, cessation is challenging; the probability of subsequently quitting is inversely proportional to the age of initiation. One novel approach to reducing the prevalence of youth smoking is the use of incentives. Objectives To determine whether incentives prevent children and adolescents from starting to smoke. We also attempted to assess the dose-response of incentives, the costs of incentive programmes, whether incentives are more or less effective in combination with other interventions to prevent smoking initiation and any unintended consequences arising from the use of incentives. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register, with additional searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CSA databases and PsycINFO for terms relating to incentives, in combination with terms for smoking and tobacco use, and children and adolescents. The most recent searches were in May 2012. Selection criteria We considered randomized controlled trials allocating children and adolescents (aged 5 to 18 years) as individuals, groups or communities to intervention or control conditions, where the intervention included an incentive aimed at preventing smoking uptake. We also considered controlled trials with baseline measures and post-intervention outcomes. Data collection…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There was insufficient information to assess the dose-response relationship or costs of incentive interventions.
“There was insufficient information to assess the dose–response relationship or costs.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
There is no statistically significant effect of incentives to prevent smoking initiation among children and adolescents (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: .84-1.19).
“Findings from seven included trials suggest that there is no statistically significant effect of incentives to prevent smoking initiation among children and adolescents (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: .84–1.19).”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
There is a lack of robust evidence to suggest that unintended consequences (such as youth making false claims about their smoking status and bullying of smoking students) are consistently associated with incentive interventions.
“There is lack of robust evidence to suggest that unintended consequences (such as youth making false claims about their smoking status and bullying of smoking students) are consistently associated with such interventions, although this has not been the focus of much research.”
From Interventions for Adolescent Substance Abuse: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Johnston, V., Liberato, S., & Thomas, D.
- Affiliations
- Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
- Charles Darwin University (AU)
- ORCID
- Thomas, David
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2012-10-17
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- CD008645-CD008645
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2777101765
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2017-06-06)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- smoking prevention, adolescent smoking, incentives, financial incentives, school-based intervention, class competition, dose-response relationship, cost-effectiveness, unintended consequences, adolescents, children, smoking initiation, abstinence, risk of bias, risk of overstatement
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Motivation, Smoking, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review