Cited by 41Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchool Health and Nursing Education

Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents

Johnston, Vanessa, Liberato, Selma, Thomas, David·2012·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Adult smoking usually has its roots in adolescence. If individuals do not take up smoking during this period it is unlikely that they ever will. Further, once smoking becomes established, cessation is challenging; the probability of subsequently quitting is inversely proportional to the age of initiation. One novel approach to reducing the prevalence of youth smoking is the use of incentives. Objectives To determine whether incentives prevent children and adolescents from starting to smoke. We also attempted to assess the dose-response of incentives, the costs of incentive programmes, whether incentives are more or less effective in combination with other interventions to prevent smoking initiation and any unintended consequences arising from the use of incentives. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register, with additional searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CSA databases and PsycINFO for terms relating to incentives, in combination with terms for smoking and tobacco use, and children and adolescents. The most recent searches were in May 2012. Selection criteria We considered randomized controlled trials allocating children and adolescents (aged 5 to 18 years) as individuals, groups or communities to intervention or control conditions, where the intervention included an incentive aimed at preventing smoking uptake. We also considered controlled trials with baseline measures and post-intervention outcomes. Data collection…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd008645.pub2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was insufficient information to assess the dose-response relationship or costs of incentive interventions.

    “There was insufficient information to assess the dose–response relationship or costs.”
  • There is no statistically significant effect of incentives to prevent smoking initiation among children and adolescents (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: .84-1.19).

    “Findings from seven included trials suggest that there is no statistically significant effect of incentives to prevent smoking initiation among children and adolescents (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: .84–1.19).”
  • There is a lack of robust evidence to suggest that unintended consequences (such as youth making false claims about their smoking status and bullying of smoking students) are consistently associated with incentive interventions.

    “There is lack of robust evidence to suggest that unintended consequences (such as youth making false claims about their smoking status and bullying of smoking students) are consistently associated with such interventions, although this has not been the focus of much research.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 79 · Cited by 41

Authors
Johnston, V., Liberato, S., & Thomas, D.
Affiliations
  • Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2012-10-17
Volume
10
Pages
CD008645-CD008645
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2777101765
Cited by
41
References
79
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
smoking prevention, adolescent smoking, incentives, financial incentives, school-based intervention, class competition, dose-response relationship, cost-effectiveness, unintended consequences, adolescents, children, smoking initiation, abstinence, risk of bias, risk of overstatement
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Motivation, Smoking, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review