Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment
Open accessAbstract
Background Experiencing anxiety and depression is very common in people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). There is uncertainty about the best treatment approach. Drug treatments may be ineffective and associated with adverse effects. Guidelines recommend psychological treatments. In this updated systematic review, we investigated the effectiveness of different psychological treatment approaches. Objectives Primary objective To assess the clinical effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing depression and anxiety in people with dementia or MCI. Secondary objectives To determine whether psychological interventions improve individuals' quality of life, cognition, activities of daily living (ADL), and reduce behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, and whether they improve caregiver quality of life or reduce caregiver burden. Search methods We searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's register, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and three trials registers on 18 February 2021. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a psychological intervention for depression or anxiety with treatment as usual (TAU) or another control intervention in people with dementia or MCI. Data collection and analysis A minimum of two authors worked independently to select trials, extract data, and assess studies for risk of bias. We classified the included psychological interventions as…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBT-based treatments added to usual care for people with dementia or MCI and depressive symptoms or diagnosis had a large effect (SMD -0.84, -1.14 to -0.54; I2=24%; 4 studies, 194 participants).
“A Cochrane review of RCTs of psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in MCI or dementia found what they labelled CBT-based treatments (four CBT, eight behavioural activation and two problem solving therapy) added to usual care for people with dementia or MCI and depressive symptoms or depressive diagnosis had a large effect ( SMD -0.84, -1.14 --0.54; I² = 24%; 4 studies - 3 of which”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [534]
Supportive and counselling treatments were not effective for depression and anxiety in MCI or dementia.
“Supportive and counselling treatments were not effective.”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [534]
CBT-based treatments had little or no effect for those without depressive symptoms or diagnosis at baseline.
“but there was little or no effect for those without depressive symptoms or diagnosis at baseline. (534)”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [534]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 224 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Orgeta, V., Leung, P., del-Pino-Casado, R., Qazi, A., Orrell, M., Spector, A. E., & Methley, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Nursing; Universidad de Jaén; Jaén Spain
- Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-25
- Volume
- 2022
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- CD009125-CD009125
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC9035877
- OpenAlex
- W4226099095
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 224
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RUJA (Universidad de Jaén) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR203760)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- depression, anxiety, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, psychological intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral activation, problem-solving therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, caregiver burden, quality of life, activities of daily living, treatment effectiveness, adverse effects, treatment discontinuation, treatment cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Dementia, Depression, Humans, Quality of Life, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review