Cited by 51Smoking Behavior and CessationIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth

Open access
Carson, Kristin V, Brinn, Malcolm P, Labiszewski, Nadina A, Peters, Matthew, Chang, Anne B, Veale, Antony, Esterman, Adrian J, Smith, Brian J·2012·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that in the non-Indigenous population. Addiction to nicotine usually begins during early adolescence and young people who reach the age of 18 as non-smokers are unlikely to become smokers thereafter. Indigenous youth in particular commence smoking at an early age, and a disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention programmes to prevent tobacco use initiation or progression to regular smoking amongst young Indigenous populations and to summarise these approaches for future prevention programmes and research. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register was searched in November 2011, with additional searches run in MEDLINE. Online clinical trial databases and publication references were also searched for potential studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials aiming to prevent tobacco use initiation or progression from experimentation to regular tobacco use in Indigenous youth. Interventions could include school-based initiatives, mass media, multi-component community level interventions, family-based programmes or public policy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data pertaining to methodology, participants, interventions and outcomes were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second, whilst information on risk of bias was extracted independently by a combination of two reviewers. Studies were assessed by qualitative narrative synthesis, as insufficient data were available to conduct a meta-analysis. The review process was examined by an Indigenous (Aboriginal) Australian for applicability, acceptability and content. MAIN RESULTS: Two studies met all of the eligibility criteria for inclusion within the review and a third was identified as ongoing. The two included studies employed multi-component community-based interventions tailored to the specific cultural aspects of the population and were based in Native American populations (1505 subjects in total). No difference was observed in weekly smoking at 42 months follow-up in the one study assessing this outcome (skills-community group versus control: risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14; skills-only group versus control: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05). For smokeless tobacco use, no difference was found between the skills-community arm and the control group at 42 weeks (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.30), though a significant difference was observed between the skills-only arm and the control group (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.85). Whilst the second study found positive changes for tobacco use in the intervention arm at post test (p < 0.05), this was not maintained at six month follow-up (change score -0.11 for intervention and 0.07 for control). Both studies were rated as high or unclear risk of bias in seven or more domains (out of a total of 10). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, a conclusion cannot be drawn as to the efficacy of tobacco prevention initiatives tailored for Indigenous youth. This review highlights the paucity of data and the need for more research in this area. Smoking prevalence in Indigenous youth is twice that of the non-Indigenous population, with tobacco experimentation commencing at an early age. As such, a significant health disparity exists where Indigenous populations, a minority, are over-represented in the burden of smoking-related morbidity and mortality. Methodologically rigorous trials are needed to investigate interventions aimed at preventing the uptake of tobacco use amongst Indigenous youth and to assist in bridging the gap between tobacco-related health disparities in Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd009325.pub2This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies in a review of tobacco prevention among young indigenous populations reported no difference in weekly smoking at 42-month follow-up.

    “The review included two studies reporting no difference in weekly smoking at 42-month follow-up.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 51

Authors
Carson, K. V., Brinn, M. P., Labiszewski, N. A., Peters, M., Chang, A. B., Veale, A., Esterman, A. J., & Smith, B. J.
Affiliations
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Clinical Practice Unit; 4A Main Building 28 Woodville Road Woodville South Adelaide South Australia Australia 5011
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-15
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
CD009325-CD009325
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2131008917
Cited by
51
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
tobacco use prevention, Indigenous youth, smoking initiation, smokeless tobacco, Native American populations, community-based intervention, school-based intervention, mass media interventions, public policy, nicotine dependence, Aboriginal Australians, intervention effectiveness, cultural tailoring, risk of bias assessment, youth smoking prevention
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Humans, Indians, North American, Smoking, Tobacco, Smokeless, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review